Kadhim Hayder A, Deb Sanjukta, Ibrahim Ali I
Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Department of P.O.P., College of Dentistry, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Feb 1;15(2):e102-e109. doi: 10.4317/jced.60028. eCollection 2023 Feb.
This study aimed to develop remineralizing calcium-phosphate (CaP) etchant pastes for enamel conditioning before bracket bonding and evaluate the bonding performance, failure pattern, and enamel surface integrity post bracket debonding in comparison with the conventional phosphoric acid (PA) etchant gel.
Micro-sized monocalcium phosphate monohydrate and hydroxyapatite (micro- and nano-sized) powders were mixed with various phosphoric and nitric acid concentrations to develop eight acidic CaP pastes. Ninety extracted human premolars were randomly assigned into eight experimental and one control group (n=10). The developed pastes and control (commercial 37% PA-gel) were applied onto the enamel using the etch-and-rinse protocol before bonding metal brackets. Shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were evaluated after 24 hours water storage (24 h) and post 5000 thermocycling (TC). Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) was used to evaluate enamel damage after bracket debonding.
The developed CaP pastes, excepting MNA1 and MPA1, resulted in significantly lower SBS values and ARI scores than 37% PA gel. Etching with 37% PA yielded roughened, cracked enamel surfaces with excessive retention of adhesive residue. In contrast, enamel treatment with the experimental pastes exhibited smooth, unblemished surfaces, with obvious CaP re-precipitation induced by mHPA2 and nHPA2 pastes and to a lesser extent by MPA2 paste.
Three newly developed CaP etchant pastes (MPA2, mHPA2, and nHPA2) can be promising alternative enamel conditioners that outperform conventional PA by generating adequate bracket bond strengths besides precipitating CaP crystals on the enamel. Moreover, these pastes maintained unblemished enamel surfaces with no or minimal adhesive residue after bracket removal. Enamel Conditioning, Calcium Phosphate, Bracket Bond Strength, Orthodontic Bonding, enamel damage.
本研究旨在开发用于正畸托槽粘结前牙釉质预处理的再矿化磷酸钙(CaP)酸蚀剂糊剂,并与传统磷酸(PA)酸蚀凝胶相比,评估其粘结性能、失败模式以及托槽拆除后牙釉质表面完整性。
将微尺寸的一水磷酸二氢钙和羟基磷灰石(微尺寸和纳米尺寸)粉末与不同浓度的磷酸和硝酸混合,制备8种酸性CaP糊剂。90颗拔除的人类前磨牙随机分为8个实验组和1个对照组(每组n = 10)。在粘结金属托槽前,按照酸蚀冲洗法将制备好的糊剂和对照组(市售37% PA凝胶)应用于牙釉质表面。在水储存24小时(24 h)后以及5000次热循环(TC)后,评估剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数(ARI)评分。使用场发射扫描电子显微镜(FE-SEM)评估托槽拆除后牙釉质损伤情况。
除MNA1和MPA1外,所开发的CaP糊剂产生的剪切粘结强度(SBS)值和ARI评分均显著低于37% PA凝胶。用37% PA酸蚀后,牙釉质表面粗糙、出现裂纹,且有过多的粘结剂残留。相比之下,用实验性糊剂处理的牙釉质表面光滑、无瑕疵,mHPA2和nHPA2糊剂可明显诱导CaP再沉淀,MPA2糊剂诱导程度较小。
三种新开发的CaP酸蚀剂糊剂(MPA2、mHPA2和nHPA2)有望成为替代牙釉质预处理剂,除了能在牙釉质上沉淀CaP晶体外,还能产生足够的托槽粘结强度,性能优于传统PA。此外,这些糊剂在托槽拆除后能保持牙釉质表面无瑕疵,粘结剂残留极少或没有。牙釉质预处理、磷酸钙、托槽粘结强度、正畸粘结、牙釉质损伤