Suppr超能文献

社区卫生工作者家访对产前保健和机构分娩的影响:马里一项集群随机试验的次要结局分析。

Effect of community health worker home visits on antenatal care and institutional delivery: an analysis of secondary outcomes from a cluster randomised trial in Mali.

机构信息

Malaria Research & Training Centre, University of Sciences Techniques and Technologies, Bamako, Mali.

Route de 501 Lodgements SEMA, MUSO, Bamako, Mali.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Mar;8(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011071.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Though community health workers (CHWs) have improved access to antenatal care (ANC) and institutional delivery in different settings, it is unclear what package and delivery strategy maximises impact.

METHODS

This study reports a secondary aim of the Proactive Community Case Management cluster randomised trial, conducted between December 2016 and April 2020 in Mali. It evaluated whether proactive home visits can improve ANC access at a population level compared with passive site-based care. 137 unique village clusters, covering the entire study area, were stratified by health catchment area and distance to the nearest primary health centre. Within each stratum, clusters were randomly assigned to intervention or control arm. CHWs in intervention clusters proactively visited all homes to provide care. In the control clusters, CHWs provided the same services at their fixed community health post to care-seeking patients. Pregnant women 15-49 years old were enrolled in a series of community-based and facility-based visits. We analysed individual-level annual survey data from baseline and 24-month and 36-month follow-up for the secondary outcomes of ANC and institutional delivery, complemented with CHW monitoring data during the trial period. We compared outcomes between: (1) the intervention and control arms, and (2) the intervention period and baseline.

RESULTS

With 2576 and 2536 pregnancies from 66 and 65 clusters in the intervention and control arms, respectively, the estimated risk ratios for receiving any ANC was 1.05 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.07), four or more ANC visits was 1.25 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.43) and ANC initiated in the first trimester was 1.11 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.19), relative to the controls; no differences in institutional delivery were found. However, both arms achieved large improvements in institutional delivery, compared with baseline. Monitoring data show that 19% and 2% of registered pregnancies received at least eight ANC contacts in the intervention and control arms, respectively. Six clusters, three from each arm had to be dropped in the last 2 years of the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Proactive home visits increased ANC and the number of antenatal contacts at the clinic and community levels. ANC and institutional delivery can be increased when provided without fees from professional CHWs in upgraded primary care clinics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02694055.

摘要

简介

尽管社区卫生工作者(CHW)在不同环境中提高了产前护理(ANC)和机构分娩的可及性,但尚不清楚哪种方案和交付策略能最大限度地发挥影响。

方法

本研究报告了 2016 年 12 月至 2020 年 4 月在马里进行的主动社区病例管理群组随机试验的次要目标。它评估了主动家访是否可以在人群层面上提高 ANC 的可及性,与被动的基于现场的护理相比。137 个独特的村庄集群,覆盖了整个研究区域,根据卫生服务区和到最近的初级保健中心的距离进行分层。在每个层次内,集群被随机分配到干预或对照组。干预组的 CHW 主动家访所有家庭提供护理。在对照组中,CHW 向寻求护理的患者在其固定的社区卫生岗位提供相同的服务。15-49 岁的孕妇参加了一系列社区和机构访问。我们分析了从基线和 24 个月和 36 个月随访获得的个体水平年度调查数据,作为 ANC 和机构分娩的次要结果,并在试验期间补充 CHW 监测数据。我们比较了以下两组之间的结果:(1)干预组和对照组,以及(2)干预期和基线。

结果

干预组和对照组分别有 2576 例和 2536 例妊娠,来自 66 个和 65 个集群,接受任何 ANC 的估计风险比为 1.05(95%CI 1.02-1.07),接受四次或更多 ANC 访问的风险比为 1.25(95%CI 1.08-1.43),在第一个三个月开始 ANC 的风险比为 1.11(95%CI 1.02-1.19),与对照组相比;机构分娩无差异。然而,与基线相比,两组都大大提高了机构分娩率。监测数据显示,干预组和对照组分别有 19%和 2%的登记妊娠接受了至少 8 次 ANC 接触。在试验的最后 2 年,有 6 个集群,每组 3 个,不得不被淘汰。

结论

主动家访增加了 ANC 和诊所及社区一级的产前接触次数。在升级后的初级保健诊所中,由专业 CHW 提供无需付费的 ANC 和机构分娩服务,可以增加 ANC 和机构分娩。

试验注册号

NCT02694055。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ab/10040070/3104673d8f4e/bmjgh-2022-011071f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验