Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan.
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2023 Jul;16(3):423-431. doi: 10.1111/ases.13180. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
In the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program, abdominal wall blocks are strongly recommended as postoperative multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic abdominal surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of single-shot rectus sheath block (RSB) with that of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) as a method of multimodal analgesia in patients receiving conventional laparoscopic abdominal surgery.
A noninferiority comparison was performed. Patients scheduled for laparoscopic gastric or colorectal surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided randomly into two groups: TEA and RSB. The primary endpoint was the numerical rating scale (NRS) score upon coughing as of 24 hours after surgery.
In total, 80 patients were randomly assigned to receive TEA (n = 42) or RSB (n = 38). Three patients were excluded from the TEA group after randomization. The NRS score on coughing as of 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the TEA group than in the RSB group (least square mean: 3.59 vs 6.39; 95% confidence interval for the difference: 1.87 to 3.74, P < .001). The NRS scores upon coughing and at rest were significantly lower in the TEA group than in the RSB group as of 4, 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia was significantly higher in the TEA group. Postoperative adverse events were not significantly different between groups.
This is the first report of comparing RSB with TEA in laparoscopic surgery. TEA may be recommended as a multimodal analgesia protocol for laparoscopic gastric and colorectal surgery.
在加速康复外科(ERAS)方案中,强烈推荐腹壁阻滞作为腹腔镜腹部手术的多模式术后镇痛方法。本研究的目的是比较单次股鞘阻滞(RSB)与胸硬膜外镇痛(TEA)作为接受常规腹腔镜腹部手术患者的多模式镇痛方法的疗效。
进行了非劣效性比较。本研究纳入了计划接受腹腔镜胃或结直肠手术的患者。患者被随机分为两组:TEA 组和 RSB 组。主要终点是术后 24 小时咳嗽时的数字评分量表(NRS)评分。
共有 80 例患者被随机分配接受 TEA(n=42)或 RSB(n=38)。TEA 组在随机分组后有 3 例患者被排除。术后 24 小时咳嗽时的 NRS 评分在 TEA 组明显低于 RSB 组(最小二乘均值:3.59 比 6.39;差值的 95%置信区间:1.87 至 3.74,P<0.001)。TEA 组在术后 4、24 和 48 小时咳嗽和休息时的 NRS 评分均明显低于 RSB 组。TEA 组患者对术后镇痛的满意度明显更高。两组术后不良事件无显著差异。
这是首次比较 RSB 与 TEA 在腹腔镜手术中的报告。TEA 可能被推荐作为腹腔镜胃和结直肠手术的多模式镇痛方案。