Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel (Drs Abu Shqara, Lowenstein, and Frank Wolf); Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel (Drs Abu Shqara, Nakhleh Francis, Haj, Markdorf, Lowenstein, and Frank Wolf).
Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel (Drs Abu Shqara, Nakhleh Francis, Haj, Markdorf, Lowenstein, and Frank Wolf).
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jun;5(6):100943. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100943. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
Catheter balloon insertion into the maternal uterine cervix is routinely speculum guided; digital insertion has been reported, but it was not found to be more tolerable among nulliparas.
In a cohort of multiparas, we aimed to evaluate maternal pain, the induction to delivery interval, and maternal satisfaction with digital insertion vs speculum-guided placement of a Foley catheter balloon for labor induction.
This randomized trial was conducted at a single, tertiary, university-affiliated hospital. The participants were multiparas (parity ≥1) and were admitted at term for labor induction with a Bishop score <6. They were randomized to 2 groups, namely the digital insertion and the speculum-guided Foley catheter insertion groups. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. The co-primary outcomes were visual analog scale scores (0-10) and induction to delivery intervals. Secondary outcomes were procedure duration, maternal satisfaction, cervical ripening (Bishop score ≥6), delivery within 24 hours, infection rate, and neonatal outcomes.
A total of 50 women were analyzed for each study group. For the digitally inserted vs speculum-guided insertion group, the median visual analog scale score at catheter insertion was lower (4; range, 0-10; vs 7; range, 0-10; P<.001), and the induction to delivery interval was similar. For the digitally inserted vs speculum-guided insertion group, the median maternal satisfaction score was greater (5; range 3-5; vs 4; 1-5; P=.01), and the median procedure duration was shorter (2.1; range, 1.4-5.3 minutes vs 3.0; range, 1.4-5.0; P<.001). In the multivariate analysis, digital insertion (P=.009) and increased parity (P=.001) independently decreased the visual analog scale score. Cervical ripening, the maternal infection rate, and the neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups.
Digital insertion of a Foley catheter balloon for cervical ripening in multiparas is less painful and quicker than speculum-guided insertion. It is also not inferior in terms of successful cervical ripening.
导管球囊插入产妇子宫颈通常在窥器引导下进行;已经报道了手指插入,但在初产妇中发现其耐受性并不更好。
在一组经产妇中,我们旨在评估数字插入与窥器引导放置 Foley 导管球囊用于引产的产妇疼痛、分娩诱导至分娩的间隔时间以及产妇满意度。
这项随机试验在一家单一的、三级、大学附属医院进行。参与者为经产妇(产次≥1),因 Bishop 评分<6 而足月入院引产。他们被随机分为两组,即数字插入组和窥器引导 Foley 导管插入组。采用意向治疗分析。主要结局是视觉模拟评分(0-10)和分娩诱导至分娩的间隔时间。次要结局是手术持续时间、产妇满意度、宫颈成熟度(Bishop 评分≥6)、24 小时内分娩、感染率和新生儿结局。
每组各有 50 名女性进行分析。与窥器引导插入组相比,导管插入时数字插入组的中位数视觉模拟评分较低(4;范围,0-10;vs 7;范围,0-10;P<.001),分娩诱导至分娩的间隔时间相似。与窥器引导插入组相比,数字插入组的中位数产妇满意度评分更高(5;范围 3-5;vs 4;1-5;P=.01),中位数手术持续时间更短(2.1;范围,1.4-5.3 分钟;vs 3.0;范围,1.4-5.0;P<.001)。多变量分析显示,数字插入(P=.009)和产次增加(P=.001)独立降低了视觉模拟评分。两组的宫颈成熟度、产妇感染率和新生儿结局无显著差异。
在经产妇中,数字插入 Foley 导管球囊用于宫颈成熟度比窥器引导插入更无痛且更快。在成功宫颈成熟度方面也不劣于后者。