Suppr超能文献

残疾人的公共交通可达性:范围审查方案

Public Transport Accessibility for People With Disabilities: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

作者信息

Mwaka Claudel R, Best Krista L, Gamache Stéphanie, Gagnon Martine, Routhier François

机构信息

Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Québec, QC, Canada.

Rehabilitation Department, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 28;12:e43188. doi: 10.2196/43188.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transportation is essential for people of all ages and backgrounds to live a fulfilling and satisfying life. Public transport (PT) can facilitate access to the community and improve social participation. However, people with disabilities may encounter barriers or facilitators in the whole travel chain that can lead to negative or positive perceptions in terms of self-efficacy or satisfaction. These barriers may be perceived depending on the nature of the disability. Few studies have identified PT barriers and facilitators experienced by people with disabilities. However, findings were focused mainly on specific disabilities. Access requires broader considerations of barriers and facilitators for various types of disabilities.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to describe the barriers and facilitators to the use of PT experienced by people with various disabilities in the whole travel chain and to explore perceived experiences, self-efficacy, and satisfaction when using PT.

METHODS

A scoping review will be conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. The literature search will be conducted using the electronic databases MEDLINE, Transport Database, and PsycINFO via Ovid platform, Embase, and Web of Science from 1995 to 2022. Two reviewers will independently identify studies based on inclusion (published in English or French, outcomes on PT accessibility for people with disabilities, peer-reviewed or guideline reports or editorials) and exclusion (no full text, focused on a technology system, outcome validation study, study on no-fixed route PT accessibility, etc) criteria and extract the data. When a study has addressed the accessibility of multiple modes of PT, including fixed-route PT, it will be retained. However, only data on fixed-route PT will be extracted. Any related systematic reviews identified through the search will be retained, and the reference lists will be hand-searched and screened for inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The search we performed on July 21, 2022, in the databases mentioned above allowed us to retrieve 6399 citations. Of these citations, 31 articles were identified, and data extraction was performed. As of March 11, 2023, we have started data analysis. The findings will be synthesized narratively to summarize the barriers and facilitators to PT, perceived experiences with PT, self-efficacy for using PT, and satisfaction with PT according to the Human Development Model-Disability Creation Process conceptual framework.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this scoping review could lead to a better understanding of the potential barriers and facilitators to the use of PT by people with various types of disabilities and how negative or positive experiences throughout the travel may influence their self-efficacy and satisfaction. The results may be used to provide recommendations to PT providers and policy makers to work together to make PT accessible, usable, and inclusive for all people with disabilities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework OSF.IO/2JDQS; https://osf.io/2jdqs.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/43188.

摘要

背景

交通对于所有年龄和背景的人过上充实而满意的生活至关重要。公共交通(PT)有助于人们融入社区并提高社会参与度。然而,残疾人在整个出行过程中可能会遇到障碍或便利因素,这可能导致他们在自我效能感或满意度方面产生负面或正面的认知。这些障碍可能因残疾的性质而有所不同。很少有研究确定残疾人在使用公共交通时遇到的障碍和便利因素。然而,研究结果主要集中在特定的残疾类型上。要实现无障碍出行,需要更广泛地考虑各种残疾类型所面临的障碍和便利因素。

目的

本范围综述旨在描述各类残疾人在整个出行过程中使用公共交通时所面临的障碍和便利因素,并探讨他们在使用公共交通时的感知体验、自我效能感和满意度。

方法

将使用阿克斯和奥马利的框架以及PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和Meta分析扩展的范围综述的首选报告项目)清单进行范围综述。文献检索将通过Ovid平台上的电子数据库MEDLINE、交通数据库和PsycINFO、Embase以及科学网,检索1995年至2022年期间的文献。两名评审员将根据纳入标准(以英文或法文发表、关于残疾人公共交通可达性的结果、同行评审或指南报告或社论)和排除标准(无全文、专注于技术系统、结果验证研究、关于非固定路线公共交通可达性的研究等)独立识别研究并提取数据。当一项研究涉及多种公共交通方式(包括固定路线公共交通)的可达性时,将予以保留。然而,仅提取关于固定路线公共交通的数据。通过检索识别出的任何相关系统综述都将被保留,并对手动检索参考列表并根据纳入标准进行筛选。

结果

我们于2022年7月21日在上述数据库中进行的检索共检索到6399条引文。在这些引文中,识别出31篇文章并进行了数据提取。截至2023年3月11日,我们已开始数据分析。研究结果将以叙述方式进行综合,以根据人类发展模型-残疾创造过程概念框架总结公共交通的障碍和便利因素、使用公共交通的感知体验、使用公共交通的自我效能感以及对公共交通的满意度。

结论

本范围综述的结果可能有助于更好地理解各类残疾人使用公共交通时潜在的障碍和便利因素,以及整个出行过程中的负面或正面体验如何影响他们的自我效能感和满意度。研究结果可用于为公共交通提供者和政策制定者提供建议,以便共同努力使公共交通对所有残疾人来说都可达、可用且具有包容性。

试验注册

开放科学框架OSF.IO/2JDQS;https://osf.io/2jdqs。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/43188。

相似文献

4
Barriers and facilitators of public transport use among people with disabilities: a scoping review.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jan 8;4:1336514. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1336514. eCollection 2023.
6
Indigenous Community Views of Disability in Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 10;14:e57590. doi: 10.2196/57590.
9
Guidance for engagement in health guideline development: A scoping review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 25;20(4):e70006. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70006. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Interdisciplinary oral and primary health care for patients with disabilities.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 17;12:1619845. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1619845. eCollection 2025.
3
Barriers and facilitators of public transport use among people with disabilities: a scoping review.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jan 8;4:1336514. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1336514. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Transportation challenges for persons aging with mobility disability: Qualitative insights and policy implications.
Disabil Health J. 2022 Jan;15(1S):101209. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101209. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
2
A systematic review of public transport accessibility for people using mobility devices.
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Aug;43(16):2253-2267. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1697382. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
3
Community participation and public transportation barriers experienced by people with disabilities.
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(23):3275-3283. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1590469. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
4
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
5
Disentangling self-management goal setting and action planning: A scoping review.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188822. eCollection 2017.
6
Travel behaviour change in old age: the role of critical incidents in public transport.
Eur J Ageing. 2016;13(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s10433-015-0358-8. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
9
On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:141-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验