Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Jul 4;49(4):851-866. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad024.
Social determinants of health (SDoHs) impact the development and course of schizophrenia-spectrum psychotic disorders (SSPDs). Yet, we found no published scholarly reviews of psychometric properties and pragmatic utility of SDoH assessments among people with SSPDs. We aim to review those aspects of SDoH assessments.
PsychInfo, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases were examined to obtain data on reliability, validity, administration process, strengths, and limitations of the measures for SDoHs identified in a paired scoping review.
SDoHs were assessed using different approaches including self-reports, interviews, rating scales, and review of public databases. Of the major SDoHs, early-life adversities, social disconnection, racism, social fragmentation, and food insecurity had measures with satisfactory psychometric properties. Internal consistency reliabilities-evaluated in the general population for 13 measures of early-life adversities, social disconnection, racism, social fragmentation, and food insecurity-ranged from poor to excellent (0.68-0.96). The number of items varied from 1 to more than 100 and administration time ranged from less than 5 minutes to over an hour. Measures of urbanicity, low socioeconomic status, immigration status, homelessness/housing instability, and incarceration were based on public records or targeted sampling.
Although the reported assessments of SDoHs show promise, there is a need to develop and test brief but validated screening measures suitable for clinical application. Novel assessment tools, including objective assessments at individual and community levels utilizing new technology, and sophisticated psychometric evaluations for reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change with effective interventions are recommended, and suggestions for training curricula are offered.
健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)会影响精神分裂症谱系精神病(SSPD)的发展和进程。然而,我们没有发现针对 SSPD 患者的 SDoH 评估的心理测量特性和实际效用的已发表学术综述。我们旨在回顾 SDoH 评估的这些方面。
使用 PsychInfo、PubMed 和 Google Scholar 数据库,对配对范围综述中确定的 SDoH 评估的可靠性、有效性、管理过程、优势和局限性的数据进行检索。
使用不同方法评估 SDoH,包括自我报告、访谈、评分量表和公共数据库审查。在主要的 SDoH 中,早期生活逆境、社会脱节、种族主义、社会碎片化和食品安全问题的测量方法具有令人满意的心理测量特性。在普通人群中评估的 13 种早期生活逆境、社会脱节、种族主义、社会碎片化和食品安全问题的措施的内部一致性可靠性范围从较差到极好(0.68-0.96)。项目数量从 1 个到 100 多个不等,管理时间从不到 5 分钟到 1 个多小时不等。城市性、社会经济地位低、移民身份、无家可归/住房不稳定和监禁的措施基于公共记录或针对性抽样。
尽管报告的 SDoH 评估显示出一定的前景,但需要开发和测试适合临床应用的简短但经过验证的筛查措施。建议开发新的评估工具,包括利用新技术进行个体和社区层面的客观评估,以及针对可靠性、有效性和对有效干预措施的变化敏感性的复杂心理测量评估,并提供培训课程的建议。