Henrikson Nora B, Ivlev Ilya, Blasi Paula R, Nguyen Matt B, Senger Caitlyn A, Perdue Leslie A, Lin Jennifer S
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon.
JAMA. 2023 Apr 18;329(15):1296-1307. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.3262.
Skin cancer is the most common cancer type and is a major cause of morbidity.
To systematically review the benefits and harms of screening for skin cancer to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.
MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from June 1, 2015, through January 7, 2022; surveillance through December 16, 2022.
English-language studies conducted in asymptomatic populations 15 years or older.
Two reviewers independently appraised the articles and extracted relevant data from fair- or good-quality studies; results were narratively summarized.
Morbidity; mortality; skin cancer stage, precursor lesions, or lesion thickness at detection; harms of screening.
Twenty studies in 29 articles were included (N = 6 053 411). Direct evidence on screening effectiveness was from 3 nonrandomized analyses of 2 population-based skin cancer screening programs in Germany (n = 1 791 615) and suggested no melanoma mortality benefit at the population level over 4 to 10 years' follow-up. Six studies (n = 2 935 513) provided inconsistent evidence on the association between clinician skin examination and lesion thickness or stage at diagnosis. Compared with usual care, routine clinician skin examination was not associated with increased detection of skin cancer or precursor lesions (5 studies) or stage at melanoma detection (3 studies). Evidence on the association between clinician skin examination and lesion thickness at detection was inconsistent (3 studies). Nine studies (n = 1 326 051) found a consistent positive association between more advanced stage at melanoma detection and increasing risk of melanoma-associated and all-cause mortality. Two studies (n = 232) found little to no persistent cosmetic or psychosocial harms associated with screening.
A substantial nonrandomized evidence base suggests a clear association between earlier stage at skin cancer detection and decreased mortality risk. However, nonrandomized studies suggest little to no melanoma mortality benefit associated with skin cancer screening with visual skin examination in adolescents or adults and no association between routine clinician skin examination and earlier stage at melanoma detection. Evidence is inconsistent regarding whether clinician skin examination is associated with thinner melanoma lesions at detection.
皮肤癌是最常见的癌症类型,是发病的主要原因。
系统评价皮肤癌筛查的益处和危害,为美国预防服务工作组提供参考。
2015年6月1日至2022年1月7日的MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库;截至2022年12月16日的监测数据。
针对15岁及以上无症状人群开展的英文研究。
两名评审员独立评估文章,并从质量为中等或良好的研究中提取相关数据;结果进行叙述性总结。
发病率;死亡率;检测时皮肤癌的分期、前驱病变或病变厚度;筛查的危害。
纳入了29篇文章中的20项研究(N = 6053411)。关于筛查有效性的直接证据来自对德国两项基于人群的皮肤癌筛查项目的3项非随机分析(n = 1791615),表明在4至10年的随访中,在人群层面上没有黑色素瘤死亡率获益。6项研究(n = 2935513)提供了关于临床医生皮肤检查与诊断时病变厚度或分期之间关联的不一致证据。与常规护理相比,常规临床医生皮肤检查与皮肤癌或前驱病变检测增加(5项研究)或黑色素瘤检测分期(3项研究)无关。关于临床医生皮肤检查与检测时病变厚度之间关联的证据不一致(3项研究)。9项研究(n = 1326051)发现,黑色素瘤检测时分期越晚与黑色素瘤相关死亡率和全因死亡率风险增加之间存在一致的正相关。2项研究(n = 232)发现与筛查相关的持续性美容或心理社会危害很小或没有。
大量非随机证据表明,皮肤癌检测时分期较早与死亡风险降低之间存在明确关联。然而,非随机研究表明,青少年或成年人通过视觉皮肤检查进行皮肤癌筛查几乎没有黑色素瘤死亡率获益,常规临床医生皮肤检查与黑色素瘤检测时分期较早之间也没有关联。关于临床医生皮肤检查与检测时较薄黑色素瘤病变是否相关的证据不一致。