Suppr超能文献

利用德尔菲共识过程建立国家优先事项设定伙伴关系,以确定适合英国进行改变实践的随机试验的新生儿研究问题。

National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the UK.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Neonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Neonatal Medicine, The University of Edinburgh MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023 Nov;108(6):569-574. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325504. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The provision of neonatal care is variable and commonly lacks adequate evidence base; strategic development of methodologically robust clinical trials is needed to improve outcomes and maximise research resources. Historically, neonatal research topics have been selected by researchers; prioritisation processes involving wider stakeholder groups have generally identified research themes rather than specific questions amenable to interventional trials.

OBJECTIVE

To involve stakeholders including parents, healthcare professionals and researchers to identify and prioritise research questions suitable for answering in neonatal interventional trials in the UK.

DESIGN

Research questions were submitted by stakeholders in population, intervention, comparison, outcome format through an online platform. Questions were reviewed by a representative steering group; duplicates and previously answered questions were removed. Eligible questions were entered into a three-round online Delphi survey for prioritisation by all stakeholder groups.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and eight respondents submitted research questions for consideration; 144 participants completed round one of the Delphi survey, 106 completed all three rounds.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-five research questions were submitted and after steering group review, 186 entered into the Delphi survey. The top five ranked research questions related to breast milk fortification, intact cord resuscitation, timing of surgical intervention in necrotising enterocolitis, therapeutic hypothermia for mild hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and non-invasive respiratory support.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified and prioritised research questions suitable for practice-changing interventional trials in neonatal medicine in the UK at the present time. Trials targeting these uncertainties have potential to reduce research waste and improve neonatal care.

摘要

背景

新生儿护理的提供情况各不相同,通常缺乏充分的证据基础;需要战略性地开展方法学稳健的临床试验,以改善结果并最大限度地利用研究资源。从历史上看,新生儿研究课题是由研究人员选择的;涉及更广泛利益相关者群体的优先排序过程通常确定的是研究主题,而不是适合干预性试验的具体问题。

目的

让包括父母、医疗保健专业人员和研究人员在内的利益攸关方参与进来,确定并优先考虑适合在英国进行新生儿干预性试验的研究问题。

设计

利益攸关方通过在线平台以人群、干预、比较、结局的形式提交研究问题。问题由代表指导小组审查;删除重复和已回答的问题。符合条件的问题被输入三轮在线德尔菲调查,由所有利益攸关方群体进行优先排序。

参与者

108 名受访者提交了供考虑的研究问题;144 名参与者完成了第一轮德尔菲调查,106 名参与者完成了三轮调查。

结果

提交了 265 个研究问题,经过指导小组审查后,有 186 个问题进入了德尔菲调查。排名前五的研究问题与母乳强化、脐带完整复苏、坏死性小肠结肠炎手术干预时机、轻度缺氧缺血性脑病的治疗性低温和非侵入性呼吸支持有关。

结论

我们已经确定并优先考虑了目前适合改变英国新生儿医学实践的干预性试验的研究问题。针对这些不确定性的试验有可能减少研究浪费并改善新生儿护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b88/10646876/4a323e3099a6/fetalneonatal-2023-325504f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验