Germone Monique, Wright Casey D, Kimmons Royce, Coburn Shayna Skelley
Digestive Health Institute Colorado Center for Celiac Disease Children's Hospital Colorado Aurora, CO United States.
Department of Psychiatry University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO United States.
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Dec 5;2(2):e37924. doi: 10.2196/37924. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
Few studies have systematically analyzed information regarding chronic medical conditions and available treatments on social media. Celiac disease (CD) is an exemplar of the need to investigate web-based educational sources. CD is an autoimmune condition wherein the ingestion of gluten causes intestinal damage and, if left untreated by a strict gluten-free diet (GFD), can result in significant nutritional deficiencies leading to cancer, bone disease, and death. Adherence to the GFD can be difficult owing to cost and negative stigma, including misinformation about what gluten is and who should avoid it. Given the significant impact that negative stigma and common misunderstandings have on the treatment of CD, this condition was chosen to systematically investigate the scope and nature of sources and information distributed through social media.
To address concerns related to educational social media sources, this study explored trends on the social media platform Twitter about CD and the GFD to identify primary influencers and the type of information disseminated by these influencers.
This cross-sectional study used data mining to collect tweets and users who used the hashtags #celiac and #glutenfree from an 8-month time frame. Tweets were then analyzed to describe who is disseminating information via this platform and the content, source, and frequency of such information.
More content was posted for #glutenfree (1501.8 tweets per day) than for #celiac (69 tweets per day). A substantial proportion of the content was produced by a small percentage of contributors (ie, "Superuser"), who could be categorized as self-promotors (eg, bloggers, writers, authors; 13.9% of #glutenfree tweets and 22.7% of #celiac tweets), self-identified female family members (eg, mother; 4.3% of #glutenfree tweets and 8% of #celiac tweets), or commercial entities (eg, restaurants and bakeries). On the other hand, relatively few self-identified scientific, nonprofit, and medical provider users made substantial contributions on Twitter related to the GFD or CD (1% of #glutenfree tweets and 3.1% of #celiac tweets, respectively).
Most material on Twitter was provided by self-promoters, commercial entities, or self-identified female family members, which may not have been supported by current medical and scientific practices. Researchers and medical providers could potentially benefit from contributing more to this space to enhance the web-based resources for patients and families.
很少有研究系统地分析社交媒体上有关慢性疾病及其可用治疗方法的信息。乳糜泻(CD)是一个需要对网络教育资源进行调查的典型例子。CD是一种自身免疫性疾病,摄入麸质会导致肠道损伤,如果不通过严格的无麸质饮食(GFD)进行治疗,可能会导致严重的营养缺乏,进而引发癌症、骨病甚至死亡。由于成本和负面污名等原因,坚持无麸质饮食可能会很困难,这些负面污名包括对麸质是什么以及谁应该避免食用麸质的错误信息。鉴于负面污名和常见误解对CD治疗有重大影响,选择这种疾病来系统地调查通过社交媒体传播的信息来源的范围和性质。
为了解决与教育性社交媒体来源相关的问题,本研究探讨了社交媒体平台推特上关于CD和无麸质饮食的趋势,以确定主要影响者以及这些影响者传播的信息类型。
这项横断面研究使用数据挖掘从8个月的时间范围内收集使用#乳糜泻和#无麸质标签的推文和用户。然后对推文进行分析,以描述通过该平台传播信息的人员以及此类信息的内容、来源和频率。
#无麸质标签发布的内容(每天1501.8条推文)比#乳糜泻标签发布的内容(每天69条推文)更多。相当一部分内容是由一小部分贡献者(即“超级用户”)产生的,这些贡献者可分为自我推广者(如博主、作家、作者;#无麸质推文的13.9%和#乳糜泻推文的22.7%)、自我认定的女性家庭成员(如母亲;#无麸质推文的4.3%和#乳糜泻推文的8%)或商业实体(如餐馆和面包店)。另一方面,相对较少的自我认定为科学、非营利和医疗服务提供者的用户在推特上对无麸质饮食或乳糜泻做出了实质性贡献(分别占#无麸质推文的1%和#乳糜泻推文的3.1%)。
推特上的大多数内容是由自我推广者、商业实体或自我认定的女性家庭成员提供的,这些内容可能未得到当前医学和科学实践的支持。研究人员和医疗服务提供者可能会从更多地参与这个领域中受益,从而为患者和家庭增加网络资源。