Suppr超能文献

英国生物库中环境可持续性的驱动因素和制约因素:平衡资源效率和未来价值。

Drivers and constraints to environmental sustainability in UK-based biobanking: balancing resource efficiency and future value.

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jun 1;24(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00908-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biobanks are a key aspect of healthcare research; they enable access to a wide range of heterogenous samples and data, as well as saving individual researchers time and funds on the collection, storage and/or curation of such resources. However, biobanks are also associated with impacts associated with a depletion of natural resources (energy, water etc.) production of toxic chemicals during manufacturing of laboratory equipment, and effects on biodiversity. We wanted to better understand the biobanking sector in the UK as a first step to assessing the environmental impacts of UK biobanking.

METHODS

We explored the sample storage infrastructure and environmental sustainability practices at a number of UK biobanks through a mixed methods quantitative and qualitative approach, including information gathering on an online platform, and eight in-depth interviews.

RESULTS

Environmental sustainability was deprioritised behind biobanks' financial sustainability practices. Nevertheless, both often aligned in practice. However, there was a tendency towards underutilisation of stored samples, the avoidance of centralisation, and providing accessibility to biosamples, and this conflicted with valuing sustainability goals. This related to notions of individualised and competitive biobanking culture. Furthermore, the study raised how value attachments to biosamples overshadows needs for both financial and environmental sustainability concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

We need to move away from individualised and competitive biobanking cultures towards a realisation that the health of the publics and patients should be first and foremost. We need to ensure the use of biosamples, ahead of their storage ('smart attachments'), align with environmental sustainability goals and participants' donation wishes for biosample use.

摘要

背景

生物库是医疗保健研究的一个关键方面;它们使人们能够访问广泛的异质样本和数据,同时还为个别研究人员节省了收集、存储和/或管理此类资源的时间和资金。然而,生物库也与自然资源(能源、水等)消耗、实验室设备制造过程中产生有毒化学品以及对生物多样性的影响等相关联。我们希望更好地了解英国的生物库行业,作为评估英国生物库环境影响的第一步。

方法

我们通过混合方法(定量和定性)探索了一些英国生物库的样本存储基础设施和环境可持续性实践,包括在在线平台上收集信息以及进行了八次深入访谈。

结果

环境可持续性被置于生物库财务可持续性实践之后。尽管如此,两者在实践中通常是一致的。然而,存储样本的利用率往往较低,避免了集中化,并提供了对生物样本的可及性,这与可持续性目标相冲突。这与个体化和竞争的生物库文化观念有关。此外,该研究提出了对生物样本的价值附加如何掩盖了对财务和环境可持续性的关注。

结论

我们需要摆脱个体化和竞争的生物库文化,认识到公众和患者的健康应该是首要的。我们需要确保在存储之前使用生物样本(“智能附件”),使其与环境可持续性目标和参与者对生物样本使用的捐赠意愿保持一致。

相似文献

3
Critical Financial Challenges for Biobanking: Report of a National Cancer Institute Study.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2019 Apr;17(2):129-138. doi: 10.1089/bio.2018.0069. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
4
Stakeholder engagement to ensure the sustainability of biobanks: a survey of potential users of biobank services.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Dec;30(12):1344-1354. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00905-x. Epub 2021 May 24.
5
Stakeholder perspectives on the ethico-legal dimensions of biobanking in South Africa.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 1;22(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00645-z.
7
Recommendations for a Dutch Sustainable Biobanking Environment.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2021 Jun;19(3):228-240. doi: 10.1089/bio.2021.0011. Epub 2021 May 27.
8
Transformation of the Taiwan Biobank 3.0: vertical and horizontal integration.
J Transl Med. 2020 Aug 6;18(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02451-4.
9
ISO 20387 biobanking standard. Analysis of requirements and experience of implementation.
Klin Lab Diagn. 2020 Sep 16;65(9):587-592. doi: 10.18821/0869-2084-2020-65-9-587-592.
10
The sample locator: A federated search tool for biosamples and associated data in Europe using HL7 FHIR.
Comput Biol Med. 2024 Sep;180:108941. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108941. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

2
Roadmap for low-carbon ultra-low temperature storage in biobanking.
J Transl Med. 2024 Aug 8;22(1):747. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05383-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Access to Biobanks: Responsibilities Within a Research Ecosystem.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2023 Jun;21(3):275-281. doi: 10.1089/bio.2021.0172. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
3
Analysis: the biodiversity footprint of the University of Oxford.
Nature. 2022 Apr;604(7906):420-424. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-01034-1.
4
Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic about sample access for research in the UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 15;12(4):e047309. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047309.
5
Sustainable biobanks: a case study for a green global bioethics.
Glob Bioeth. 2022 Feb 24;33(1):50-64. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2021.1997428. eCollection 2022.
6
Open science, data sharing and solidarity: who benefits?
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Nov 11;43(4):115. doi: 10.1007/s40656-021-00468-6.
7
What Do Biomedical Researchers Want from Biobanks? Results of an Online Survey.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2022 Jun;20(3):271-282. doi: 10.1089/bio.2021.0084. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
8
Understanding the Mechanism of Social Attachment Role in Social Media: A Qualitative Analysis.
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 6;12:720880. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720880. eCollection 2021.
9
Recommendations for a Dutch Sustainable Biobanking Environment.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2021 Jun;19(3):228-240. doi: 10.1089/bio.2021.0011. Epub 2021 May 27.
10
Stakeholder engagement to ensure the sustainability of biobanks: a survey of potential users of biobank services.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Dec;30(12):1344-1354. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00905-x. Epub 2021 May 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验