Coburn Kelly L, Williams Diane L
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Autism Adulthood. 2023 Jun 1;5(2):154-164. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0080. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
Narrative production is an important part of the diagnostic process for autism. Most existing research on narrative production by autistic people has focused on cisgender men and boys. Members of other genders (i.e., nonbinary people, transgender men, and trans and cisgender women) are underrepresented in the research literature. Research with non-autistic adults consistently reports gender differences in narrative production. When adults whose genders are underrepresented seek autism diagnosis as adults, they may be misdiagnosed due to misconceptions about autistic communication that are based on cisgender male speakers.
Twenty autistic adults of various genders each told four narratives: two based on a picture and two about their personal experiences. Dependent variables measured narrative length, grammatical complexity, vocabulary diversity, filled pauses, and internal state terms. Researchers used nonparametric statistics to compare groups of (1) cisgender men and all other participants, (2) participants assigned male at birth and those assigned female, and (3) self-identified women, nonbinary people, and men.
Women used significantly less diverse vocabulary than men. Women used more terms to refer to internal states than both nonbinary people and men, but this finding was not significant after correction for multiple comparisons. All other comparisons were not statistically significant.
Autistic narrators of diverse genders have more linguistic similarities than differences. Autistic women may be more likely to talk about emotions and other internal states than autistic men. Gender-based expectations for spoken communication about internal states should be carefully reconsidered. More research is necessary to determine whether the results of this small study will generalize to larger samples of autistic people whose genders are currently underrepresented in the research literature.
叙事生成是自闭症诊断过程的重要组成部分。现有的关于自闭症患者叙事生成的研究大多集中在顺性别男性和男孩身上。其他性别群体(即非二元性别者、跨性别男性以及跨性别和顺性别女性)在研究文献中的代表性不足。对非自闭症成年人的研究一致报告了叙事生成中的性别差异。当性别代表性不足的成年人寻求自闭症诊断时,他们可能会因基于顺性别男性说话者的自闭症沟通误解而被误诊。
20名不同性别的自闭症成年人每人讲述了四个故事:两个基于一幅图片,两个关于他们的个人经历。因变量测量了叙事长度、语法复杂性、词汇多样性、填充停顿和内部状态术语。研究人员使用非参数统计方法比较了以下几组:(1)顺性别男性和所有其他参与者;(2)出生时被指定为男性的参与者和被指定为女性的参与者;(3)自我认同为女性、非二元性别者和男性的参与者。
女性使用的词汇多样性明显低于男性。女性用来指代内部状态的术语比非二元性别者和男性都多,但在进行多重比较校正后,这一发现并不显著。所有其他比较均无统计学意义。
不同性别的自闭症叙事者在语言方面的相似之处多于差异。自闭症女性可能比自闭症男性更倾向于谈论情感和其他内部状态。基于性别的关于内部状态口头交流的期望应仔细重新审视。有必要进行更多研究,以确定这项小型研究的结果是否能推广到研究文献中目前代表性不足的更大样本的自闭症患者身上。