Suppr超能文献

晚期肾细胞癌患者的3期CLEAR研究:乐伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗组和舒尼替尼组亚组的结果

Phase 3 CLEAR study in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: outcomes in subgroups for the lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab and sunitinib arms.

作者信息

Grünwald Viktor, Powles Thomas, Eto Masatoshi, Kopyltsov Evgeny, Rha Sun Young, Porta Camillo, Motzer Robert, Hutson Thomas E, Méndez-Vidal María José, Hong Sung-Hoo, Winquist Eric, Goh Jeffrey C, Maroto Pablo, Buchler Tomas, Takagi Toshio, Burgents Joseph E, Perini Rodolfo, He Cixin, Okpara Chinyere E, McKenzie Jodi, Choueiri Toni K

机构信息

Clinic for Medical Oncology and Clinic for Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Barts Cancer Institute and the Royal Free Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 16;13:1223282. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1223282. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The phase 3 CLEAR study demonstrated that lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab significantly improved efficacy versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Prognostic features including presence and/or site of baseline metastases, prior nephrectomy, and sarcomatoid features have been associated with disease and treatment success. This subsequent analysis explores outcomes in patients with or without specific prognostic features.

METHODS

In CLEAR, patients with clear cell RCC were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive either lenvatinib (20 mg/day) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks), lenvatinib (18 mg/day) plus everolimus (5 mg/day), or sunitinib alone (50 mg/day, 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off). In this report, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were all assessed in the lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab and the sunitinib arms, based on baseline features: lung metastases, bone metastases, liver metastases, prior nephrectomy, and sarcomatoid histology.

RESULTS

In all the assessed subgroups, median PFS was longer with lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab than with sunitinib treatment, notably among patients with baseline bone metastases (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.52) and patients with sarcomatoid features (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18-0.84). Median OS favored lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab over sunitinib irrespective of metastatic lesions at baseline, prior nephrectomy, and sarcomatoid features. Of interest, among patients with baseline bone metastases the HR for survival was 0.50 (95% CI 0.30-0.83) and among patients with sarcomatoid features the HR for survival was 0.91 (95% CI 0.32-2.58); though for many groups, median OS was not reached. ORR also favored lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab over sunitinib across all subgroups; similarly, complete responses also followed this pattern.

CONCLUSION

Efficacy outcomes improved following treatment with lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab versus sunitinib in patients with RCC-irrespective of the presence or absence of baseline lung metastases, baseline bone metastases, baseline liver metastases, prior nephrectomy, or sarcomatoid features. These findings corroborate those of the primary CLEAR study analysis in the overall population and support lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as a standard of care in 1L treatment for patients with advanced RCC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02811861.

摘要

引言

3期CLEAR研究表明,对于晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)患者,作为一线治疗,乐伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗的疗效显著优于舒尼替尼。包括基线转移灶的存在和/或部位、既往肾切除术以及肉瘤样特征等预后因素与疾病及治疗结局相关。本后续分析探讨了具有或不具有特定预后特征患者的治疗结果。

方法

在CLEAR研究中,透明细胞RCC患者被随机分配(1:1:1)接受以下治疗:乐伐替尼(20mg/天)联合帕博利珠单抗(每3周200mg)、乐伐替尼(18mg/天)联合依维莫司(5mg/天)或单独使用舒尼替尼(50mg/天,服用4周,停药2周)。在本报告中,基于基线特征(肺转移、骨转移、肝转移、既往肾切除术和肉瘤样组织学),对乐伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗组和舒尼替尼组的无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和客观缓解率(ORR)进行了评估。

结果

在所有评估的亚组中,乐伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗治疗的中位PFS长于舒尼替尼治疗,尤其是在基线有骨转移的患者(HR 0.33,95%CI 0.21 - 0.52)和具有肉瘤样特征的患者(HR 0.39,95%CI 0.18 - 0.84)中。无论基线转移灶情况、既往肾切除术和肉瘤样特征如何,中位OS均显示乐伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗优于舒尼替尼。有趣的是,在基线有骨转移的患者中,生存HR为0.50(95%CI 0.30 - 0.83),在具有肉瘤样特征的患者中,生存HR为0.91(95%CI 0.32 - 2.58);不过,许多组未达到中位OS。在所有亚组中,ORR也显示乐伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗优于舒尼替尼;同样,完全缓解情况也遵循这一模式。

结论

对于RCC患者,无论基线是否存在肺转移、骨转移、肝转移、既往肾切除术或肉瘤样特征,乐伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗治疗后的疗效均优于舒尼替尼。这些发现证实了CLEAR研究在总体人群中的主要分析结果,并支持乐伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗作为晚期RCC患者一线治疗的标准治疗方案。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符NCT02811861。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa06/10471185/8470c6166953/fonc-13-1223282-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验