Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan (K.K., N.T., S.H., T.K., T.F., H.M., Y.O., H.K.).
Minamisanriku Hospital, Miyagi, Japan (M.N.).
Hypertension. 2023 Nov;80(11):2464-2472. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21578. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
Home blood pressure (BP) is an important component of digital strategies for hypertension management. However, no studies have used the same device to investigate 24-hour BP control status in relation to different home BP control thresholds.
Participants in the general practitioner-based, multicenter HI-JAMP study (Home-Activity Information and Communication Technology-Based Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective) underwent office BP measurement, then 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, then home BP monitoring for 5 days. A validated all-in-one BP monitoring device was used to measure office, home, and ambulatory BP. Baseline data were used to investigate ambulatory BP control status in individuals with well-controlled home BP based on the different guideline thresholds (125/75 mm Hg, 130/80 mm Hg, and 135/85 mm Hg).
Data from 2269 patients were analyzed. For individuals with well-controlled home BP <135/85 mm Hg (59.5% of the total population), the prevalence of uncontrolled 24-hour (≥130/80 mm Hg), daytime (≥135/85 mm Hg), and nighttime ambulatory BP (≥120/70 mm Hg) was 19.9%, 18.5%, and 33.6%, respectively. Corresponding prevalence rates in the 42.7% of participants with well-controlled home BP <130/80 mm Hg were 13.4%, 12.9%, and 26.0%, and when well-controlled home BP was strictly defined as <125/75 mm Hg (23.9% of the population), prevalence of rates of uncontrolled 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory BP were 7.0%, 9.0%, and 15.3%, respectively.
Home BP control status defined using different thresholds could predict 24-hour ambulatory BP control status in treated hypertension. One-third of individuals still had uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension when home BP was controlled to <135/85 mm Hg, but ambulatory BP was quite well controlled when home BP was <125/75 mm Hg.
家庭血压(BP)是高血压管理数字策略的重要组成部分。然而,尚无研究使用相同的设备来调查不同家庭 BP 控制阈值与 24 小时 BP 控制状况之间的关系。
参与以全科医生为基础的多中心 HI-JAMP 研究(基于家庭活动信息和通信技术的日本动态血压监测前瞻性研究)的患者先接受诊室血压测量,然后进行 24 小时动态血压监测,再进行 5 天的家庭血压监测。使用经过验证的一体式 BP 监测设备测量诊室、家庭和动态血压。使用基线数据根据不同指南阈值(125/75mmHg、130/80mmHg 和 135/85mmHg)调查家庭 BP 控制良好的个体的动态血压控制状况。
共分析了 2269 例患者的数据。对于家庭 BP 控制良好的患者(<135/85mmHg,占总人群的 59.5%),24 小时(≥130/80mmHg)、白天(≥135/85mmHg)和夜间动态血压(≥120/70mmHg)未得到控制的比例分别为 19.9%、18.5%和 33.6%。家庭 BP 控制良好的患者中(<130/80mmHg,占 42.7%),相应的患病率为 13.4%、12.9%和 26.0%,当严格定义家庭 BP 控制良好为<125/75mmHg(占总人口的 23.9%)时,24 小时、白天和夜间动态血压未得到控制的比例分别为 7.0%、9.0%和 15.3%。
使用不同阈值定义的家庭 BP 控制状况可以预测治疗高血压患者的 24 小时动态血压控制状况。当家庭 BP 控制在<135/85mmHg 时,仍有三分之一的患者存在夜间高血压未得到控制,但当家庭 BP<125/75mmHg 时,动态血压控制相当好。