Santos Carlos V, Monteiro Shirlene A, Soares Amanda S C, Souto Isabeli C A, Moura Renaldo T
Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Paraiba, Joao Pessoa, Paraiba 58051-970, Brazil.
Department of Chemistry, State University of Paraiba, Campina Grande, Paraiba 58051-970, Brazil.
J Phys Chem A. 2023 Sep 28;127(38):7997-8014. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.3c04504. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
Quantum chemical bonding descriptors based on the total and overlap density can provide valuable information about chemical interactions in different systems. However, these descriptors can be sensitive to the basis set used. To address this, different numerical treatments of electron density have been proposed to reduce the basis set dependency. In this work, we introduce overlap properties (OPs) obtained through numerical treatment of the electron density and present the topology of overlap density (TOP) for the first time. We compare the basis set dependency of numerical OP and TOP descriptors with their quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) counterparts, considering the total electron density. Three single (C-C, C-O, and C-F) bonds in ethane, methanol, and fluoromethane and two double (C═C and C═O) bonds in ethene and formaldehyde were analyzed. Diatomic molecules Li-X with X = F, Cl, and Br were also analyzed. Eight parameters, including QTAIM descriptors and OP/TOP descriptors, are used to assess the basis dependency at the ωB97X-D level of theory using 28 basis sets from three classes: Pople, Ahlrichs, and Dunning. The study revealed that the topological overlap electron density properties exhibit comparatively lesser dependence on the basis set compared to their total electron density counterparts. Remarkably, these properties retain their chemical significance even with reduced basis set dependency. Similarly, numerical OP descriptors show less basis set dependency than their QTAIM counterparts. The excess of polarization functions increases charge concentration in the interatomic region and influences both QTAIM and OP descriptors. The basis sets Def2TZVP, 6-31++G(d,p), 6-311++G(d,p), cc-pVDZ, cc-pVTZ, and cc-pVQZ demonstrate reduced variability for the tested bond classes in this study, with particular emphasis on the triple-ζ quality Ahlrichs' basis set. We recommend against using basis sets with numerous polarization functions, such as augmented Dunning's and Ahlrichs' quadruple-ζ.
基于总密度和重叠密度的量子化学键描述符可以提供有关不同体系中化学相互作用的有价值信息。然而,这些描述符可能对所使用的基组敏感。为了解决这个问题,人们提出了对电子密度进行不同的数值处理,以减少对基组的依赖性。在这项工作中,我们引入了通过对电子密度进行数值处理获得的重叠性质(OPs),并首次展示了重叠密度拓扑(TOP)。我们考虑总电子密度,将数值OP和TOP描述符的基组依赖性与其分子中原子的量子理论(QTAIM)对应物进行比较。分析了乙烷、甲醇和氟甲烷中的三个单键(C-C、C-O和C-F)以及乙烯和甲醛中的两个双键(C═C和C═O)。还分析了X = F、Cl和Br的双原子分子Li-X。使用来自三个类别的28个基组:Pople、Ahlrichs和Dunning,在ωB97X-D理论水平下,使用包括QTAIM描述符和OP/TOP描述符在内的八个参数来评估基组依赖性。研究表明,与总电子密度对应物相比,拓扑重叠电子密度性质对基组的依赖性相对较小。值得注意的是,即使基组依赖性降低,这些性质仍保留其化学意义。同样,数值OP描述符比其QTAIM对应物表现出更小的基组依赖性。过多的极化函数会增加原子间区域的电荷浓度,并影响QTAIM和OP描述符。在本研究中,基组Def2TZVP、6-31++G(d,p)、6-311++G(d,p)、cc-pVDZ、cc-pVTZ和cc-pVQZ对测试的键类表现出较小的变异性,特别强调了三重ζ质量的Ahlrichs基组。我们建议不要使用具有大量极化函数的基组,例如增强的Dunning和Ahlrichs四重ζ基组。