Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 May;10(3):461-468. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) yields poor functional outcomes and relatively high complication rates. Gleason score (GS) 6 prostate cancer (PCa) has genetic and clinical features showing little, if not absent, metastatic potential. However, the behavior of GS 6 PCa recurring after previous PCa treatment including radiotherapy and/or ablation has not been investigated.
To evaluate the oncological outcomes of sRP for radio- and/or ablation-recurrent GS 6 PCa.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective data of sRP for recurrent PCa after local nonsurgical treatment were collected from 14 tertiary referral centers from 2000 to 2021.
Prostate biopsy before sRP and sRP.
A survival analysis was performed for pre-sRP biopsy and sRP-proven GS 6. Concordance between PCa at pre-sRP biopsy and sRP histology was assessed.
We included GS 6 recurrent PCa at pre-sRP biopsy (n = 142) and at sRP (n = 50), as two cohorts. The majority had primary radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy (83.8% of GS 6 patients at pre-sRP biopsy; 78% of GS 6 patients at sRP) and whole-gland treatments (91% biopsy; 85.1% sRP). Biopsy GS 6 10-yr metastasis, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were 79% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61-89%), 98% (95-99%), and 89% (78-95%), respectively. Upgrading at sRP was 69%, 35.5% had a pT3 stage, and 13.4% had positive nodes. The sRP GS 6 10-yr metastasis-free survival, CSS, and OS were 100%, 100%, and 90% (95% CI 58-98%) respectively; pT3 and pN1 disease were found in 12% and 0%, respectively. Overall complications, high-grade complications, and severe incontinence were experienced by >50%, >10%, and >15% of men, respectively (in both the biopsy and the sRP cohorts). Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and absence of a centralized pathological review.
GS 6 sRP-proven PCa recurring after nonsurgical primary treatment has almost no metastatic potential, while patients experience relevant morbidity of the procedure. However, a significant proportion of GS 6 cases at pre-sRP biopsy are upgraded at sRP. In the idea not to overtreat, efforts should be made to improve the diagnostic accuracy of pre-sRP biopsy.
We investigated the oncological results of salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer of Gleason score (GS) 6 category. We found a very low malignant potential of GS 6 confirmed at salvage radical prostatectomy despite surgical complications being relatively high. Nonetheless, biopsy GS 6 was frequently upgraded and had less optimal oncological control. Overtreatment for recurrent GS 6 after nonsurgical first-line treatment should be avoided, and efforts should be made to increase the diagnostic accuracy of biopsies for recurrent disease.
挽救性前列腺根治术(sRP)的功能结果较差,且并发症发生率相对较高。前列腺癌(PCa)的 Gleason 评分(GS)为 6 时,其具有遗传和临床特征,其转移潜能很小,如果有的话,也几乎不存在。然而,局部非手术治疗后复发的 GS 6 PCa 的行为尚未得到研究。
评估 sRP 治疗局部非手术治疗后复发的 GS 6 PCa 的肿瘤学结果。
设计、设置和参与者:从 2000 年至 2021 年,14 个三级转诊中心回顾性地收集了 sRP 治疗局部非手术治疗后复发 PCa 的资料。
在 sRP 前进行前列腺活检和 sRP。
对 sRP 前活检和 sRP 证实的 GS 6 进行生存分析。评估 sRP 前活检和 sRP 组织学之间的 PCa 一致性。
我们将 sRP 前活检(n=142)和 sRP(n=50)中的 GS 6 复发性 PCa 分为两组。大多数患者接受了原发性放疗和/或近距离放疗(sRP 前活检的 GS 6 患者中,83.8%;sRP 的 GS 6 患者中,78%)和全腺体治疗(活检中 91%;sRP 中 85.1%)。sRP 前活检的 GS 6 患者 10 年的转移、癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)分别为 79%(95%CI 61-89%)、98%(95-99%)和 89%(78-95%)。sRP 时的升级率为 69%,35.5%为 pT3 期,13.4%有阳性淋巴结。sRP GS 6 患者 10 年无转移生存率、CSS 和 OS 分别为 100%、100%和 90%(95%CI 58-98%);pT3 和 pN1 疾病分别为 12%和 0%。总体并发症、高级别并发症和严重尿失禁发生率分别超过 50%、超过 10%和超过 15%(活检和 sRP 队列中均如此)。局限性包括研究的回顾性性质和缺乏集中的病理审查。
经非手术初次治疗后复发的 GS 6 sRP 证实的 PCa 几乎没有转移潜能,尽管手术并发症的发生率相对较高,但患者仍会出现相关的手术并发症。然而,sRP 前活检的 GS 6 病例中有相当大的比例在 sRP 时被升级。为避免对 GS 6 复发过度治疗,应努力提高 sRP 前活检的诊断准确性。
我们研究了挽救性前列腺根治术治疗 Gleason 评分(GS)为 6 类复发前列腺癌的肿瘤学结果。我们发现,尽管手术并发症相对较高,但在挽救性前列腺根治术后,GS 6 得到了确认,其恶性潜能非常低。尽管如此,活检 GS 6 还是经常升级,且肿瘤控制效果较差。对于局部非手术一线治疗后复发的 GS 6 ,应避免过度治疗,并努力提高复发疾病活检的诊断准确性。