Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 May;10(3):486-488. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
Pathology grading of prostate biopsy follows the rule that the highest International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (GG) is the GG assigned. This rule was developed in the systematic biopsy (SBx) era and makes sense when samples are from very different areas of the prostate. This rule has been kept for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx), for which multiple samples-targeted and systematic-are taken from small areas. In particular, if the results for SBx and MRI-TBx are discordant, the patient is assigned the higher GG. However, the most appropriate grading when MRI-TBx and SBx grades are discordant has never been investigated empirically. A cohort of patients who have undergone SBx and MRI-TBx with long oncological follow-up does not yet exist. To estimate the risk of recurrence for every combination of biopsy and pathological grades, we used the GG on radical prostatectomy (RP) as a surrogate for GG on MRI-TBx GG surrogate. We analyzed data for 12 468 men who underwent SBx and RP at a tertiary referral center and assessed 5-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) for each pairwise combination of biopsy and surgical GG results. We found that for cases with discordant SBx and RP grades, the risk of recurrence was intermediate, irrespective of whether the highest grade was at RP or SBx. For instance, the 5-yr bRFS rate was 57% for men with GG 3 on RP and 60% for men with GG 3 on SBx, but 63% for men with RP GG 3 and SBx GG 2, and 79% for men with RP GG 2 and SBx GG 3. Translating these findings to MRI-TBx casts doubt on current grading practice: when GGs are discordant between SBx and MRI-TBx, the risk of biochemical recurrence risk is not driven by the highest grade but by an intermediate between the two grades. Our findings should motivate studies assessing long-term outcomes for patients undergoing both MRI-TBx and SBx with a view to empirically evaluating current grading practices. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with prostate cancer may undergo two biopsy types: (1) systematic biopsy, for which sampling follows a systematic template; and (2) targeted biopsy, for which samples are taken from lesions detected on scans. There may be a difference in prostate cancer grade identified by the two approaches. In such cases, the risk of cancer recurrence seems to be predicted by an intermediate grade between the lower and higher grades.
前列腺活检的病理分级遵循的规则是,采用最高的国际泌尿病理学会分级组(GG)。该规则是在系统活检(SBx)时代制定的,在前列腺的不同区域取样时具有意义。该规则已适用于多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)靶向活检(MRI-TBx),因为后者从小区域中靶向和系统地采集多个样本。特别是,如果 SBx 和 MRI-TBx 的结果不一致,患者会被分配更高的 GG。然而,对于 MRI-TBx 和 SBx 分级不一致时最合适的分级方法,尚未经过实证研究。目前还没有接受 SBx 和 MRI-TBx 检查且具有长期肿瘤学随访的患者队列。为了估计每种活检和病理分级组合的复发风险,我们使用根治性前列腺切除术(RP)上的 GG 作为 MRI-TBx 上 GG 的替代物。我们分析了在一家三级转诊中心接受 SBx 和 RP 的 12468 名男性的数据,并评估了每种活检和手术 GG 结果的组合 5 年生化无复发生存率(bRFS)。我们发现,对于 SBx 和 RP 分级不一致的病例,无论 RP 还是 SBx 的最高分级如何,复发风险均为中等。例如,RP GG 3 的男性 5 年 bRFS 率为 57%,而 SBx GG 3 的男性为 60%,但 RP GG 3 和 SBx GG 2 的男性为 63%,而 RP GG 2 和 SBx GG 3 的男性为 79%。将这些发现转化为 MRI-TBx,对当前的分级实践提出了质疑:当 SBx 和 MRI-TBx 之间的 GG 不一致时,生化复发风险的大小并非由最高分级决定,而是由两个分级之间的中间分级决定。我们的发现应该促使人们开展研究,评估同时接受 MRI-TBx 和 SBx 治疗的患者的长期结局,以从经验上评估当前的分级实践。
患有前列腺癌的患者可能接受两种活检类型:(1)系统活检,其采样遵循系统模板;(2)靶向活检,其样本取自扫描中检测到的病变。两种方法可能会识别出不同的前列腺癌分级。在这种情况下,癌症复发的风险似乎由较低和较高分级之间的中间分级来预测。