Suppr超能文献

ChatGPT 是否为非英语母语的学术写作者带来了“普罗米修斯之火”?

Is ChatGPT a "Fire of Prometheus" for Non-Native English-Speaking Researchers in Academic Writing?

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.

出版信息

Korean J Radiol. 2023 Oct;24(10):952-959. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0773.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have garnered considerable interest for their potential to aid non-native English-speaking researchers. These models can function as personal, round-the-clock English tutors, akin to how Prometheus in Greek mythology bestowed fire upon humans for their advancement. LLMs can be particularly helpful for non-native researchers in writing the Introduction and Discussion sections of manuscripts, where they often encounter challenges. However, using LLMs to generate text for research manuscripts entails concerns such as hallucination, plagiarism, and privacy issues; to mitigate these risks, authors should verify the accuracy of generated content, employ text similarity detectors, and avoid inputting sensitive information into their prompts. Consequently, it may be more prudent to utilize LLMs for editing and refining text rather than generating large portions of text. Journal policies concerning the use of LLMs vary, but transparency in disclosing artificial intelligence tool usage is emphasized. This paper aims to summarize how LLMs can lower the barrier to academic writing in English, enabling researchers to concentrate on domain-specific research, provided they are used responsibly and cautiously.

摘要

大型语言模型(LLMs),如 ChatGPT,因其有望帮助非英语母语的研究人员而引起了相当大的关注。这些模型可以充当个人、全天候的英语导师,就像希腊神话中的普罗米修斯为人类的进步而赋予人类火一样。LLMs 对于非英语母语的研究人员在撰写手稿的引言和讨论部分特别有帮助,因为他们经常在这些部分遇到挑战。然而,使用 LLM 生成研究手稿的文本会带来幻觉、抄袭和隐私问题等风险;为了降低这些风险,作者应该验证生成内容的准确性,使用文本相似度检测器,并避免在提示中输入敏感信息。因此,更明智的做法可能是利用 LLM 编辑和精炼文本,而不是生成大量文本。期刊关于使用 LLM 的政策各不相同,但强调了披露人工智能工具使用情况的透明度。本文旨在总结 LLM 如何降低用英语进行学术写作的门槛,使研究人员能够专注于特定领域的研究,前提是他们负责任和谨慎地使用。

相似文献

1
Is ChatGPT a "Fire of Prometheus" for Non-Native English-Speaking Researchers in Academic Writing?
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Oct;24(10):952-959. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0773.
3
The use of artificial intelligence to improve the scientific writing of non-native english speakers.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Sep 18;69(9):e20230560. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230560. eCollection 2023.
4
ChatGPT: ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research.
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2023 Sep 30;17(9):1292-1299. doi: 10.3855/jidc.18738.
9
Implications of large language models such as ChatGPT for dental medicine.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Oct;35(7):1098-1102. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13046. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Generative artificial intelligence in public health research and scientific communication: A narrative review of real applications and future directions.
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 18;11:20552076251362070. doi: 10.1177/20552076251362070. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
How Can We Make Scientific Events More Inclusive? Insights From Q&A Sessions and Surveys From an International Conference.
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jul 13;15(7):e71588. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71588. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Navigating cognitive dissonance: master's students' experiences with ChatGPT in dissertation writing.
Front Psychol. 2025 May 9;16:1542559. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1542559. eCollection 2025.
6
A manifesto for a globally diverse, equitable, and inclusive open science.
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jan 29;3(1):16. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00179-1.
7
Generative artificial intelligence in graduate medical education.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 10;11:1525604. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1525604. eCollection 2024.
8
Three versions of an atopic dermatitis case report written by humans, artificial intelligence, or both: Identification of authorship and preferences.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024 Nov 26;4(1):100373. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100373. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

3
Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence.
Science. 2023 Jul 14;381(6654):187-192. doi: 10.1126/science.adh2586. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
4
Beyond the Keyboard: Academic Writing in the Era of ChatGPT.
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Jul 3;38(26):e207. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e207.
6
Use of Large Language Models and Artificial Intelligence Tools in Works Submitted to .
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul 1;41(19):3480-3481. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00819. Epub 2023 May 18.
8
Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2023 Jul;47(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.04.009. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
9
Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?
Crit Care. 2023 Feb 25;27(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2.
10
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use.
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7945):612. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验