North-Western Tuscany Blood Bank, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Laboratory of Virology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases "Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS", Rome, Italy.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Aug;19(2):2260040. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2260040. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
Convalescent plasma has been extensively tested during the COVID-19 pandemic as a transfusion product. Similarly, monoclonal antibodies have been largely administered either intravenously or intramuscularly. Nevertheless, when used against a respiratory pathogen, respiratory delivery is preferable to maximize the amount of antibody that reaches the entry door in order to prevent sustained viral multiplication. In this narrative review, we review the different types of inhalation device and summarize evidence from animal models and early clinical trials supporting the respiratory delivery (for either prophylactic or therapeutic purposes) of convalescent plasma or monoclonal antibodies (either full antibodies, single-chain variable fragments, or camelid-derived monoclonal heavy-chain only antibodies). Preliminary evidences from animal models suggest similar safety and noninferior efficacy, but efficacy evaluation from clinical trials is still limited.
恢复期血浆在 COVID-19 大流行期间作为输血产品得到了广泛的测试。同样,单克隆抗体也主要通过静脉内或肌内给药。然而,当用于呼吸道病原体时,为了最大限度地增加到达进入点的抗体量以防止持续的病毒复制,呼吸道给药是首选。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们回顾了不同类型的吸入装置,并总结了来自动物模型和早期临床试验的证据,这些证据支持将恢复期血浆或单克隆抗体(全抗体、单链可变片段或骆驼科单克隆重链抗体)通过呼吸道给药(无论是用于预防还是治疗)。动物模型的初步证据表明安全性相似且非劣效性,但来自临床试验的疗效评估仍然有限。