Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA.
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 20;42(3):266-272. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00377. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
Despite defined grades of 1 to 5 for adverse events (AEs) on the basis of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria, mild (G1) and moderate (G2) AEs are often not reported in phase III trials. This under-reporting may inhibit our ability to understand patient toxicity burden. We analyze the relationship between the grades of AEs experienced with patient side-effect bother and treatment discontinuation
We analyzed a phase III Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network trial with comprehensive AE data. The Likert response Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-GP5 item, "I am bothered by side effects of treatment" was used to define side-effect bother. Bayesian mixed models were used to assess the impact of G1 and G2 AE counts on patient side-effect bother and treatment discontinuation. AEs were further analyzed on the basis of symptomatology (symptomatic or asymptomatic). The results are given as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible interval (CrI).
Each additional G1 and G2 AEs experienced during a treatment cycle increased the odds of increased self-reported patient side-effect bother by 13% (95% CrI, 1.06 to 1.21) and 35% (95% CrI, 1.19 to 1.54), respectively. Furthermore, only AEs defined as symptomatic were associated with increased side-effect bother, with asymptomatic AEs showing no association regardless of grade. Count of G2 AEs increased the odds of treatment discontinuation by 59% (95% CrI, 1.32 to 1.95), with symptomatic G2 AEs showing a stronger association (OR, 1.75; 95% CrI, 1.28 to 2.39) relative to asymptomatic G2 AEs (OR, 1.45; 95% CrI, 1.12 to 1.89).
Low- and moderate-grade AEs are related to increased odds of increased patient side-effect bother and treatment discontinuation, with symptomatic AEs demonstrating greater magnitude of association than asymptomatic. Our findings suggest that limiting AE capture to grade 3+ misses important contributors to treatment side-effect bother and discontinuation.
尽管根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)对不良事件(AE)进行了 1 到 5 级的定义,但在 III 期试验中,通常不会报告轻度(G1)和中度(G2)AE。这种漏报可能会限制我们理解患者毒性负担的能力。我们分析了患者不良反应困扰程度与治疗中断之间的关系。
我们分析了一项具有全面 AE 数据的 III 期东部肿瘤协作组-美国放射肿瘤学会网络试验。使用李克特反应功能评估癌症治疗-GP5 项目“我对治疗的副作用感到困扰”来定义副作用困扰。贝叶斯混合模型用于评估 G1 和 G2 AE 计数对患者不良反应困扰和治疗中断的影响。进一步根据症状学(有症状或无症状)对 AE 进行分析。结果以比值比(OR)和 95%可信区间(CrI)表示。
在一个治疗周期中,每增加一次 G1 和 G2 AE,患者自我报告的不良反应困扰程度增加的可能性分别增加 13%(95%CrI,1.06 至 1.21)和 35%(95%CrI,1.19 至 1.54)。此外,只有被定义为有症状的 AE 与增加的不良反应困扰相关,而无症状的 AE 无论其等级如何均与增加的不良反应困扰无关。G2 AE 计数增加了治疗中断的可能性 59%(95%CrI,1.32 至 1.95),有症状的 G2 AE 显示出更强的相关性(OR,1.75;95%CrI,1.28 至 2.39),而无症状的 G2 AE 则为(OR,1.45;95%CrI,1.12 至 1.89)。
低级别和中级别 AE 与增加的患者不良反应困扰和治疗中断的可能性相关,有症状的 AE 比无症状的 AE 表现出更大的关联程度。我们的发现表明,将 AE 捕获限制在 3 级及以上会错过导致治疗不良反应和中断的重要因素。