Suppr超能文献

欧洲药品管理局在双酚A监管方面与欧洲食品安全局存在冲突。

European Medicines Agency Conflicts With the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on Bisphenol A Regulation.

作者信息

Zoeller R Thomas, Birnbaum Linda S, Collins Terrence J, Heindel Jerrold, Hunt Patricia A, Iguchi Taisen, Kortenkamp Andreas, Myers John Peterson, Vom Saal Frederick S, Sonnenschein Carlos, Soto Ana M

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.

School of Science and Technology, University of Örebro, Örebro, Sweden.

出版信息

J Endocr Soc. 2023 Aug 12;7(9):bvad107. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvad107. eCollection 2023 Aug 2.

Abstract

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has revised their estimate of the toxicity of bisphenol A (BPA) and, as a result, have recommended reducing the tolerable daily intake (TDI) by 20 000-fold. This would essentially ban the use of BPA in food packaging such as can liners, plastic food containers, and in consumer products. To come to this conclusion, EFSA used a systematic approach according to a pre-established protocol and included all guideline and nonguideline studies in their analysis. They found that Th-17 immune cells increased with very low exposure to BPA and used this endpoint to revise the TDI to be human health protective. A number of regulatory agencies including the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have written formal disagreements with several elements of EFSA's proposal. The European Commission will now decide whether to accept EFSA's recommendation over the objections of EMA. If the Commission accepts EFSA's recommendation, it will be a landmark action using knowledge acquired through independent scientific studies focused on biomarkers of chronic disease to protect human health. The goal of this Perspective is to clearly articulate the monumental nature of this debate and decision and to explain what is at stake. Our perspective is that the weight of evidence clearly supports EFSA's proposal to reduce the TDI by 20 000-fold.

摘要

欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)已修订其对双酚A(BPA)毒性的评估,因此建议将每日可耐受摄入量(TDI)降低20000倍。这将基本上禁止在食品包装(如罐头内衬、塑料食品容器)以及消费品中使用双酚A。为得出这一结论,欧洲食品安全局根据预先制定的方案采用了系统方法,并在分析中纳入了所有指导性和非指导性研究。他们发现,极低剂量的双酚A暴露会使Th-17免疫细胞增加,并以此为依据修订每日可耐受摄入量,以保护人类健康。包括欧洲药品管理局(EMA)在内的一些监管机构已就欧洲食品安全局提议的多个方面提出了正式异议。欧盟委员会现在将决定是否不顾欧洲药品管理局的反对而接受欧洲食品安全局的建议。如果委员会接受欧洲食品安全局的建议,这将是一项具有里程碑意义的行动,利用通过专注于慢性病生物标志物的独立科学研究获得的知识来保护人类健康。本观点文章的目的是清晰阐明这场辩论和决策的重大性质,并解释其中的利害关系。我们的观点是,证据的分量明显支持欧洲食品安全局将每日可耐受摄入量降低20000倍的提议。

相似文献

1
European Medicines Agency Conflicts With the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on Bisphenol A Regulation.
J Endocr Soc. 2023 Aug 12;7(9):bvad107. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvad107. eCollection 2023 Aug 2.
4
Exposure to bisphenol A in European women from 2007 to 2014 using human biomonitoring data - The European Joint Programme HBM4EU.
Environ Int. 2024 Aug;190:108912. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108912. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
6
When the weight of evidence does not weigh enough: EFSA's draft scientific opinion on BPA.
Toxicol Sci. 2023 May 31;193(2):115-118. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfad034.
7
Drivers of divergent assessments of bisphenol-A hazards to semen quality by various European agencies, regulators and scientists.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2024 Jan;255:114293. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114293. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
8
[Task and function of the European Food Safety Authority].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2004 Sep;47(9):862-7. doi: 10.1007/s00103-004-0897-1.
10
European Food Safety Authority open access tools to estimate dietary exposure to food chemicals.
Environ Int. 2021 Apr;149:106357. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106357. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Release of Bisphenol A from Dental Materials: Risks and Future Perspectives.
J Dent Res. 2025 Jun 16;104(10):220345251337728. doi: 10.1177/00220345251337728.
3
Micro(nano)plastics and Their Potential Impact on Human Gut Health: A Narrative Review.
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024 Mar 21;46(3):2658-2677. doi: 10.3390/cimb46030168.

本文引用的文献

1
Re-evaluation of the risks to public health related to the presence of bisphenol A (BPA) in foodstuffs.
EFSA J. 2023 Apr 19;21(4):e06857. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.6857. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Evaluating adverse effects of environmental agents in food: a brief critique of the US FDA's criteria.
Environ Health. 2023 Apr 21;22(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12940-023-00971-2.
3
Data integration, analysis, and interpretation of eight academic CLARITY-BPA studies.
Reprod Toxicol. 2020 Dec;98:29-60. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
EDC-2: The Endocrine Society's Second Scientific Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals.
Endocr Rev. 2015 Dec;36(6):E1-E150. doi: 10.1210/er.2015-1010. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
7
Why public health agencies cannot depend on good laboratory practices as a criterion for selecting data: the case of bisphenol A.
Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Mar;117(3):309-15. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800173. Epub 2008 Oct 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验