Joseph Warren S, Kosinski Mark A, Rogers Lee C
Arizona College of Podiatric Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, USA.
Department of Medicine, New York College of Podiatric Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2023 Oct 27:15347346231207553. doi: 10.1177/15347346231207553.
Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are a common and costly complication of diabetes. Soft tissue and bone infections in DFIs frequently lead to amputation and/or sepsis which can be costly for both the patient and the healthcare system. is the most commonly identified causative agent in DFIs, and people with diabetes may have an increased risk of infection with methicillin-resistant (MRSA). In addition to increased susceptibility to severe infection, MRSA in DFIs is associated with high rates of treatment failure, morbidity, and hospitalization costs meaning appropriate treatment is a high priority. While hospitalized patients are usually treated with intravenous (IV) vancomycin, this can be costly in terms of inpatient stays, staffing costs, and adverse events. For example, vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury not only delays hospital discharge and increases costs but is also a particular concern for patients with diabetes who already have an increased risk of kidney problems. Vancomycin-resistant strains of have also been identified, which means that alternative treatment options may need to be explored. Treatment alternatives to IV vancomycin, including oral antibiotics, have been shown to provide similar efficacy, with reduced costs, outpatient or home-based administration, and with fewer serious adverse effects. Although infectious disease specialists often use IV vancomycin alone, or in combination, as a first-line therapeutic option, they are increasingly seeing the value of outpatient or at-home oral antibiotics as an alternative. This manuscript reviews the evidence for true costs of vancomycin therapy for MRSA-associated DFIs and examines the alternatives.
糖尿病足感染(DFIs)是糖尿病常见且代价高昂的并发症。DFIs中的软组织和骨感染常导致截肢和/或败血症,这对患者和医疗系统来说成本都很高。金黄色葡萄球菌是DFIs中最常鉴定出的病原体,糖尿病患者感染耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的风险可能更高。除了对严重感染的易感性增加外,DFIs中的MRSA还与高治疗失败率、发病率和住院费用相关,这意味着适当的治疗是重中之重。虽然住院患者通常用静脉注射(IV)万古霉素治疗,但这在住院时间、人员成本和不良事件方面可能成本很高。例如,万古霉素相关的急性肾损伤不仅会延迟出院并增加成本,而且对于已经有更高肾脏问题风险的糖尿病患者来说尤其令人担忧。也已鉴定出耐万古霉素的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株,这意味着可能需要探索替代治疗方案。静脉注射万古霉素的替代治疗方案,包括口服抗生素,已显示出具有相似的疗效,成本降低,可门诊或在家给药,且严重不良反应较少。尽管传染病专家通常单独或联合使用静脉注射万古霉素作为一线治疗选择,但他们越来越认识到门诊或在家口服抗生素作为替代方案的价值。本手稿回顾了万古霉素治疗MRSA相关DFIs的实际成本证据,并研究了替代方案。