Mumuni Seidu, O'Donnell Claire, Doody Owen
Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland.
Health Research Institute, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 20;11(20):2780. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202780.
The purpose of this scoping review was to identify the risk factors and screening uptake for prostate cancer.
Scoping review.
Arksey and O'Malley's framework guided this review; five databases (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Academic Search Complete and Cochrane Library) and grey literature were searched. Screening was undertaken against predetermined inclusion criteria for articles published before July 2023 and written in English. This review is reported in line with PRISMA-Sc.
10,899 database results were identified; 3676 papers were removed as duplicates and 7115 papers were excluded at title and abstract review. A total of 108 papers were full-text reviewed and 67 were included in the review. Grey literature searching yielded no results. Age, family history/genetics, hormones, race/ethnicity, exposure to hazards, geographical location and diet were identified as risk factors. Prostatic antigen test (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) and prostate biopsy were identified as screening/diagnostic methods. The evidence reviewed highlights moderate knowledge and screening uptake of prostate cancer with less than half of men reporting for PSA screening. On the other hand, there is a year-to-year increase in PSA and DRE screening, but factors such as poverty, religion, culture, communication barriers, language and costs affect men's uptake of prostate cancer screening.
As prostate cancer rates increase globally, there is a need for greater uptake of prostate cancer screening and improved health literacy among men and health workers. There is a need to develop a comprehensive prostate cancer awareness and screening programme that targets men and addresses uptake issues so as to provide safe, quality care.
(1) A broad search strategy was utilised incorporating both databases and grey literature. (2) The PRISMA reporting guidelines were utilised. (3) Only English language papers were included, and this may have resulted in relevant articles being omitted.
本范围综述的目的是确定前列腺癌的风险因素和筛查接受情况。
范围综述。
采用阿克斯和奥马利的框架指导本综述;检索了五个数据库(护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)、学术搜索完整版和考克兰图书馆)以及灰色文献。根据预定的纳入标准对2023年7月之前发表且为英文撰写的文章进行筛选。本综述按照PRISMA-Sc进行报告。
共识别出10899条数据库结果;3676篇论文因重复被剔除,7115篇论文在标题和摘要评审时被排除。共对108篇论文进行了全文评审,67篇被纳入本综述。灰色文献检索未得到结果。年龄、家族史/遗传学、激素、种族/民族、接触危害因素、地理位置和饮食被确定为风险因素。前列腺抗原检测(PSA)、直肠指检(DRE)、经直肠超声(TRUS)、磁共振成像(MRI)、磁共振波谱成像(MRSI)和前列腺活检被确定为筛查/诊断方法。所综述的证据凸显了对前列腺癌的了解程度和筛查接受情况一般,报告进行PSA筛查的男性不到一半。另一方面,PSA和DRE筛查逐年增加,但贫困、宗教、文化、沟通障碍、语言和费用等因素影响男性对前列腺癌筛查的接受情况。
随着全球前列腺癌发病率上升,需要提高男性和医护人员对前列腺癌筛查的接受度并提高健康素养。有必要制定一项针对男性的全面前列腺癌认知和筛查计划,并解决接受度问题,以提供安全、优质的护理。
(1)采用了广泛的检索策略,纳入了数据库和灰色文献。(2)采用了PRISMA报告指南。(3)仅纳入了英文论文,这可能导致相关文章被遗漏。