Suppr超能文献

农场经营方式和抗生素使用如何影响小农户养殖场的疾病发生率:来自乌干达一项调查的证据

How farm practices and antibiotic use drive disease incidence in smallholder livestock farms: Evidence from a survey in Uganda.

作者信息

Emes Eve, Wieland Barbara, Magnusson Ulf, Dione Michel

机构信息

Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

Institute of Virology and Immunology, Mittelhäusern, Switzerland.

出版信息

One Health. 2023 Sep 14;17:100627. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100627. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing threat to human and animal health, and the growth in AMR prevalence globally is thought to be partially driven by non-therapeutic antibiotic use in livestock production. However, livestock farms may depend on antibiotics as a prophylactic disease management tool, and reducing antibiotic use in isolation may harm farmers' economic security. In order to help farmers safely reduce their antibiotic use, we must first determine how necessary non-therapeutic antibiotic use is for disease management, and how other farm practices can guard against disease and make antibiotic use reduction safe and feasible.

METHODS

Using the (AMUSE) tool, a standardised survey tool for investigating attitudes and practices relating to antibiotic use on farms, we investigated the farming practices and animal disease outcomes of smallholder livestock farms in Uganda. We used logistic regression to investigate the effect of prophylactic antibiotic use; as well as of prophylactic vaccination, non-antimicrobial medicines, and on-farm biosecurity measures; on the likelihood of disease outbreaks.

FINDINGS

We found that prophylactic antibiotic use did indeed seem to guard against disease outbreaks, underlining the rationality of non-therapeutic antibiotic use in smallholder livestock farms and the need to pair antibiotic use reduction with other interventions in order to mitigate risk. The most effective intervention pairing varied by species, with expanded access to animal health services and the use of prophylactic vaccination demonstrating the greatest potential overall.

IMPLICATIONS

These findings echo earlier results generated using the AMUSE survey tool. They should be followed by participatory research in which farmers are consulted to explore intervention options, and subsequently by farm-level intervention trials of combined antimicrobial stewardship interventions to verify their effectiveness.

摘要

背景

抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)对人类和动物健康构成的威胁日益严重,全球AMR流行率的上升被认为部分是由畜牧生产中非治疗性抗生素的使用所驱动。然而,畜牧场可能依赖抗生素作为预防性疾病管理工具,孤立地减少抗生素使用可能会损害农民的经济安全。为了帮助农民安全地减少抗生素使用,我们必须首先确定非治疗性抗生素使用对于疾病管理的必要性,以及其他农场做法如何预防疾病并使抗生素使用减少安全可行。

方法

我们使用“农场抗生素使用态度与实践调查”(AMUSE)工具,这是一种用于调查农场抗生素使用态度和实践的标准化调查工具,对乌干达小农户畜牧场的养殖实践和动物疾病结果进行了调查。我们使用逻辑回归来研究预防性抗生素使用的影响;以及预防性疫苗接种、非抗菌药物和农场生物安全措施的影响;对疾病爆发可能性的影响。

研究结果

我们发现预防性抗生素使用似乎确实能预防疾病爆发,这凸显了小农户畜牧场非治疗性抗生素使用的合理性,以及将抗生素使用减少与其他干预措施相结合以降低风险的必要性。最有效的干预组合因物种而异,扩大动物健康服务的可及性和使用预防性疫苗接种总体上显示出最大的潜力。

启示

这些发现与使用AMUSE调查工具得出的早期结果相呼应。接下来应该进行参与式研究,咨询农民以探索干预选项,随后进行联合抗菌药物管理干预的农场层面干预试验,以验证其有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45d6/10665161/2aaf2e456fc2/fx2.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验