Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2024 Mar;34(2):e2939. doi: 10.1002/eap.2939. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
Recruitment limitation is known to influence species abundances and distributions. Recognition of how and why it occurs both in natural and in designed environments could improve restoration. Aquatic insects, for instance, rarely reestablish in restored streams to levels comparable to reference streams even years after restoration. We experimentally increased oviposition habitat in five out of 10 restored streams in western North Carolina to test whether insect egg-laying habitat was limiting insect populations in restored streams. A main goal was to test whether adding oviposition habitat in the form of rocks that partially protrude above the water surface could be used to increase the abundance and richness of stream insect eggs and larval insects in restored streams. Adding egg-laying habitat enhanced several response variables (e.g., protruding rocks, number of eggs, egg masses, egg morphotype richness, and oviposition habitat stability) to levels similar to those found in reference streams. Following the addition of protruding rocks, egg mass abundance increased by 186% and richness by 77% in restored-treated streams. Densities of larval insects that attached their eggs to protruding rocks showed an overall pattern consistent with treatment effects due to the combination of nonsignificant and significant increases of several taxa and not just one taxon. Our results indicate that these stream insect populations are limited by oviposition habitat and that adding egg-laying habitat alleviated this component of recruitment limitation. However, the weaker larval response indicates that additional post-recruitment factors, such as egg or larval mortality, may still be limiting a full recovery of larval insect abundances in these restored streams. This study shows the importance of integrating information from animal life histories, ecology, and geomorphology into restoration practices to improve the recovery of aquatic insects, which are commonly used to assess water quality and the biological efficacy of stream restoration.
招募限制已知会影响物种的丰度和分布。认识到它在自然和设计环境中是如何以及为何发生的,可能会改善恢复。例如,水生昆虫在恢复后的溪流中很少能恢复到与参考溪流相当的水平,即使在恢复多年后也是如此。我们在北卡罗来纳州西部的 10 条恢复溪流中的 5 条中进行了实验,增加了产卵栖息地,以测试昆虫产卵栖息地是否限制了恢复溪流中的昆虫种群。一个主要目标是测试以部分突出水面的岩石形式增加产卵栖息地是否可以用来增加恢复溪流中溪流昆虫卵和幼虫昆虫的丰度和丰富度。增加产卵栖息地增强了几个响应变量(例如,突出的岩石、卵的数量、卵块、卵形态丰富度和产卵栖息地稳定性),使其达到与参考溪流相似的水平。在添加突出的岩石后,恢复处理溪流中的卵块丰度增加了 186%,丰富度增加了 77%。附着在突出岩石上的幼虫昆虫的密度总体上与处理效应一致,这是由于几个分类群的非显著和显著增加的结合,而不仅仅是一个分类群。我们的结果表明,这些溪流昆虫种群受到产卵栖息地的限制,并且添加产卵栖息地缓解了这种招募限制的组成部分。然而,幼虫的反应较弱表明,可能仍然存在其他的后招募因素,如卵或幼虫的死亡率,限制了这些恢复溪流中幼虫昆虫丰度的完全恢复。这项研究表明,将动物生活史、生态学和地貌学的信息整合到恢复实践中对于改善水生昆虫的恢复非常重要,水生昆虫通常被用来评估水质和溪流恢复的生物效果。