Suppr超能文献

2023 年全球对乙酰氨基酚过量治疗的调查。

An international survey of the treatment of massive paracetamol overdose in 2023.

机构信息

Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwell Health, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Hofstra/Northwell, NY, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2023 Nov;61(11):968-973. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2023.2286922. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Changes in the commercialization of nonprescription drugs have made large quantities of paracetamol available to individuals, resulting in larger overdoses than previously observed. Although most patients with paracetamol overdose can be managed with acetylcysteine, patients with a massive overdose may become critically ill earlier and fail standard antidotal therapy. Several strategies are proposed for the management of these patients, including using increased doses of acetylcysteine, extracorporeal removal, and fomepizole. However, the benefits of these strategies remain largely theoretical, with sparse evidence for efficacy in humans.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study surveys international practice patterns of medical toxicology providers regarding the management of a hypothetical patient with a massive paracetamol overdose.

RESULTS

A total of 342 responses from 31 different nations were obtained during the study period. Sixty-one percent of providers would have increased their acetylcysteine dosing when treating the hypothetical massive overdose. Thirty percent of respondents recommended an indefinite infusion of acetylcysteine at 12.5 mg/kg/hour after the bolus dose, whereas 20 percent recommended following the "Hendrickson" protocol, which advocates for a stepwise increase in acetylcysteine dosing to match high paracetamol concentrations at the 300 mg/L, 400 mg/L, and 600 mg/L lines on the Rumack-Matthew nomogram. Ten percent of respondents stated they would have given "double dose acetylcysteine" but did not specify what that entailed. Forty-seven percent of respondents indicated that they would have given fomepizole, and 28 percent of respondents recommended extracorporeal removal.

DISCUSSION

Our survey study assessed the approach to a hypothetical patient with a massive paracetamol overdose and demonstrated that, at minimum, most respondents would increase the dose of acetylcysteine. Additionally, almost half would also include fomepizole, and nearly one-third would include extracorporeal removal.

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable international variation for the treatment of both non-massive and massive paracetamol overdoses. Future research is needed to identify and standardize the most effective treatment for both non-massive and massive paracetamol overdoses.

摘要

简介

非处方药物的商业化变化使得大量扑热息痛可供个人使用,导致过量服用的情况比以前观察到的更为严重。虽然大多数扑热息痛过量的患者可以使用乙酰半胱氨酸进行治疗,但大量过量的患者可能会更早地出现危重症,并对标准解毒治疗无效。目前提出了几种治疗这些患者的策略,包括增加乙酰半胱氨酸的剂量、体外清除和法美匹韦。然而,这些策略的益处在很大程度上仍停留在理论层面,在人体中疗效的证据很少。

方法

本横断面研究调查了国际医学毒理学家在处理假设的大剂量扑热息痛过量患者方面的实践模式。

结果

在研究期间,共收到来自 31 个不同国家的 342 份回复。61%的提供者在治疗假设的大剂量过量时会增加乙酰半胱氨酸的剂量。30%的受访者建议在推注剂量后以 12.5mg/kg/h 的速度持续输注乙酰半胱氨酸,而 20%的受访者建议遵循“亨德森”方案,该方案主张根据 Rumack-Matthew 列线图上 300mg/L、400mg/L 和 600mg/L 线的高扑热息痛浓度逐步增加乙酰半胱氨酸的剂量。10%的受访者表示他们会使用“双倍剂量乙酰半胱氨酸”,但未具体说明具体内容。47%的受访者表示会使用法美匹韦,28%的受访者建议进行体外清除。

讨论

我们的调查研究评估了处理假设的大剂量扑热息痛过量患者的方法,结果表明,至少大多数受访者会增加乙酰半胱氨酸的剂量。此外,近一半的人还会使用法美匹韦,近三分之一的人会使用体外清除。

结论

在治疗非大量和大量扑热息痛过量方面,国际上存在很大差异。需要进一步研究来确定和标准化非大量和大量扑热息痛过量的最有效治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验