Suppr超能文献

女性尿失禁新型在线综合盆底项目的初步研究。

Pilot Study of a Novel Online Comprehensive Pelvic Floor Program for Urinary Incontinence in Women.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Feb;35(2):415-421. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05695-y. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Urinary incontinence (UI) is common in women and has a vast impact on quality of life (QOL), financial health, and work disability. Robust evidence demonstrates the efficacy of comprehensive conservative therapy (pelvic floor muscle training [PFMT], and behavioral and dietary modification) in the treatment of UI. However, numerous barriers impede access to this care, including limited specialized therapists, financial barriers, and scheduling obstacles. To address these barriers, we developed a novel comprehensive online pelvic floor program (oPFP).

METHODS

We performed a prospective study assessing continence and QOL outcomes in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence (UUI), or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) treated with oPFP between May 2019 and November 2022. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and following completion of the 2-month program using the validated International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Urgency Perception Scale (UPS), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) questionnaires, and 24-h bladder diary. Data were analyzed using linear, Poisson mixed models, or generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight women (2 SUI, 3 UUI, 23 MUI) were enrolled and 19 (2 SUI, 2 UUI, 15 MUI) completed the study. Following oPFP, participants showed significantly improved SUI domain scores (3.04 ± 0.19 vs 1.81 ± 0.23, p < 0.001), UPS reason score (2.52 ± 0.18 vs 2.05 ± 0.14, p = 0.003), IIQ-7 sum scores (5.16 ± 0.88 vs 3.07 ± 0.70, p = 0.038), and daily incontinence episodes (2.96 ± 0.60 vs 1.06 ± 0.29, p < 0.001). Mean patient-reported improvement was 5.4 ± 2.5 (ten-point Likert scale). Of respondents, 89% reported program satisfaction, ease of use, and would recommend the program to others.

CONCLUSION

The oPFP results in significant improvements to a variety of UI and QOL measures. This program provides an important UI treatment option and gives women greater access to effective conservative therapy.

摘要

介绍和假设

尿失禁(UI)在女性中很常见,对生活质量(QOL)、财务健康和工作能力丧失有很大影响。大量证据证明了综合保守治疗(盆底肌肉训练[PFMT]和行为及饮食改变)在治疗 UI 中的疗效。然而,许多障碍阻碍了这种护理的获得,包括有限的专业治疗师、经济障碍和日程安排障碍。为了解决这些障碍,我们开发了一种新的综合在线盆底项目(oPFP)。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,评估了 2019 年 5 月至 2022 年 11 月期间接受 oPFP 治疗的压力性尿失禁(SUI)、急迫性尿失禁(UUI)或混合性尿失禁(MUI)女性的尿失禁和 QOL 结局。在基线和完成为期 2 个月的方案后,使用经过验证的国际尿失禁咨询问卷-女性下尿路症状、急迫感量表(UPS)、失禁影响问卷(IIQ-7)问卷和 24 小时膀胱日记评估结果。使用线性、泊松混合模型或广义估计方程进行数据分析。

结果

共纳入 28 名女性(2 名 SUI、3 名 UUI、23 名 MUI),其中 19 名(2 名 SUI、2 名 UUI、15 名 MUI)完成了研究。接受 oPFP 后,参与者的 SUI 域评分(3.04±0.19 与 1.81±0.23,p<0.001)、UPS 原因评分(2.52±0.18 与 2.05±0.14,p=0.003)、IIQ-7 总分(5.16±0.88 与 3.07±0.70,p=0.038)和每日失禁次数(2.96±0.60 与 1.06±0.29,p<0.001)均显著改善。患者报告的平均改善程度为 5.4±2.5(十分制量表)。89%的受访者表示对该项目满意,易于使用,并愿意将其推荐给他人。

结论

oPFP 可显著改善各种 UI 和 QOL 指标。该方案提供了一种重要的 UI 治疗选择,使女性更容易获得有效的保守治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验