Chi Kim N, Armstrong Andrew J, Krause Bernd J, Herrmann Ken, Rahbar Kambiz, de Bono Johann S, Adra Nabil, Garje Rohan, Michalski Jeff M, Kempel Mette M, Fizazi Karim, Morris Michael J, Sartor Oliver, Brackman Marcia, DeSilvio Michelle, Wilke Celine, Holder Geoffrey, Tagawa Scott T
British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate & Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Eur Urol. 2024 Apr;85(4):382-391. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.004. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
[Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (Lu-PSMA-617) plus the standard of care (SoC) significantly improved overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival versus SoC alone in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the VISION trial. We evaluated the safety of additional cycles of Lu-PSMA-617 and the impact of longer observation time for patients receiving Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC.
VISION was an international, open-label study. Patients were randomised 2:1 to receive Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC or SoC alone. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was assessed in prespecified subgroups of patients who received ≤4 cycles versus 5-6 cycles of treatment and during each cycle of treatment. The TEAE incidence was also adjusted for treatment exposure to calculate the incidence per 100 patient-treatment years of observation. This analysis was performed for the first occurrence of TEAEs.
The any-grade TEAE incidence was similar in cycles 1-4 and cycles 5-6. TEAE frequency was similar across all cycles of Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. No additional safety concerns were reported for patients who received >4 cycles. The exposure-adjusted safety analysis revealed that the overall TEAE incidence was similar between arms, but distinct trends for different TEAE types were noted and the incidence of events associated with Lu-PSMA-617 remained higher in the Lu-PSMA-617 arm.
Longer exposure to Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC was not associated with a higher toxicity risk, and the extended time for safety observation could account for the higher TEAE incidence in comparison to SoC alone. The findings support a favourable benefit-risk profile for 6 cycles of Lu-PSMA-617 in this setting and the use of up to 6 cycles of Lu-PSMA-617 in patients who are clinically benefiting from and tolerating this therapy.
For patients with metastatic prostate cancer no longer responding to hormone therapy, an increase in the number of cycles of treatment with a radioactive compound called Lu-PSMA-617 from four to six had no additional adverse side effects.
在VISION试验中,与单独使用标准治疗(SoC)相比,[镥]镥-PSMA-617(Lu-PSMA-617)联合标准治疗显著改善了前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)阳性转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的总生存期和影像学无进展生存期。我们评估了额外周期的Lu-PSMA-617的安全性以及更长观察时间对接受Lu-PSMA-617联合SoC治疗患者的影响。
VISION是一项国际开放性研究。患者按2:1随机分组,分别接受Lu-PSMA-617联合SoC或单独接受SoC治疗。在接受≤4个周期与5 - 6个周期治疗的预设亚组患者以及每个治疗周期中评估治疗期间出现的不良事件(TEAE)的发生率。还对治疗暴露情况进行调整以计算每100患者治疗年观察期内的发生率。该分析针对首次出现的TEAE进行。
1 - 4周期和5 - 6周期的任何级别的TEAE发生率相似。Lu-PSMA-617治疗的所有周期中TEAE频率相似。对于接受>4个周期治疗的患者,未报告额外的安全问题。暴露调整后的安全性分析显示,两组之间的总体TEAE发生率相似,但不同类型的TEAE呈现出不同趋势,且Lu-PSMA-617组中与Lu-PSMA-617相关的事件发生率仍然较高。
更长时间暴露于Lu-PSMA-617联合SoC与更高的毒性风险无关,与单独使用SoC相比,延长的安全观察时间可能导致TEAE发生率更高。这些发现支持在这种情况下6个周期的Lu-PSMA-617具有良好的获益风险特征,并支持在临床上从该治疗中获益且能耐受的患者中使用多达6个周期的Lu-PSMA-617。
对于不再对激素治疗有反应的转移性前列腺癌患者,将一种名为Lu-PSMA-617的放射性化合物的治疗周期数从4个增加到6个不会产生额外的不良副作用。