Northern School of Anaesthesia, Newcastle, Upon Tyne, UK.
Department of Anaesthesia, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2024 Mar;79(3):261-269. doi: 10.1111/anae.16207. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
Anaesthetic practice contributes to climate change. Volatile capture technology, typically based on adsorption to a carbon- or silica-based substrate, has the potential to mitigate some of the harmful effects of using halogenated hydrocarbons. Anaesthetists have a professional responsibility to use anaesthetic agents which offer the greatest safety and clinical benefit with the lowest financial cost and environmental impacts. Inhalational anaesthetics should be used at an appropriate concentration with a minimal fresh gas flow via a circle system to minimise unnecessary waste. Once practice efficiencies have been maximised, only then should technical solutions such as volatile capture be employed. In this narrative review, we focus on the available literature relating to volatile capture technology, obtained via a targeted literature search and through contacting manufacturers and researchers. We found six studies focusing on the Blue-Zone Technologies Deltasorb®, SageTech Medical SID and Baxter/ZeoSys CONTRAfluran™ volatile capture systems. Though laboratory analyses of available systems suggest that > 95% in vitro mass transfer is possible for all three systems, the in vivo results for capture efficiency vary from 25% to 73%. Currently, there is no financial incentive for healthcare organisations to capture waste anaesthetic gases, and so the value of volatile capture technology requires quantification. System-level organisations, such as Greener NHS, are best positioned to commission such evaluations and make policy decisions to guide investment. Further research using volatile capture technology in real-world settings is necessary and we highlight some priority research questions to improve our understanding of the utility of this group of technologies.
麻醉实践对气候变化有影响。挥发性捕获技术通常基于吸附到碳或硅基基质上,有可能减轻使用卤代烃的一些有害影响。麻醉师有责任使用提供最大安全性和临床效益、最低财务成本和环境影响的麻醉剂。吸入性麻醉剂应在适当浓度下使用,通过循环系统以最小的新鲜气流来最小化不必要的浪费。一旦达到最佳实践效率,仅应采用挥发性捕获等技术解决方案。在本叙述性综述中,我们重点关注通过有针对性的文献检索以及联系制造商和研究人员获得的与挥发性捕获技术相关的可用文献。我们发现了六项研究,重点介绍了 Blue-Zone Technologies Deltasorb®、SageTech Medical SID 和 Baxter/ZeoSys CONTRAfluran™挥发性捕获系统。尽管可用系统的实验室分析表明,所有三种系统的体外传质率均超过 95%,但捕获效率的体内结果从 25%到 73%不等。目前,医疗机构没有捕获浪费麻醉气体的经济激励,因此需要对挥发性捕获技术的价值进行量化。像 Greener NHS 这样的系统级组织最适合委托此类评估并做出政策决策,以指导投资。在实际环境中使用挥发性捕获技术的进一步研究是必要的,我们强调了一些优先研究问题,以提高我们对这组技术的实用性的理解。