Tai Vicky, Gow Peter, Stewart Sarah, Satpanich Panchalee, Li Changgui, Abhishek Abhishek, Dalbeth Nicola
Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Counties Manukau Health, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2024 Apr;65:152367. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152367. Epub 2024 Jan 7.
There is uncertainty about the optimal time to start urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in the setting of a gout flare. The aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of ULT initiation during a gout flare.
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA methodology. MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between database inception to 1 March 2023. RCTs published in English that examined ULT initiation during a gout flare in adults ≥18 years were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Data were extracted for the following outcomes: patient-rated pain score, duration of gout flare, recurrent gout flares, time to achieve target serum urate, adherence to ULT, patient satisfaction with treatment and adverse events. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager v5.4. This study is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42023404680.
A total of 972 studies were identified and of these, six RCTs met the criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Three studies were assessed as having high risk of bias, one study as having some concerns, and two studies as having low risk of bias. In total, there were 445 pooled participants; 226 participants randomised to early initiation of ULT and 219 to placebo or delayed initiation of ULT. Allopurinol was used in three studies, febuxostat in two studies and probenecid in one study. Few participants (n = 62, 13.9 %) had tophaceous gout. Participants with renal impairment were excluded from most studies. There were no differences in patient-rated pain scores at baseline, days 3-4, days 7-8, day 10 or days 14-15 (p ≥ 0.42). Additionally, there was no significant difference in time to resolution of gout flare (standardised mean difference 0.77 days; 95 % CI -0.26 to 1.79; p = 0.14) or the risk of recurrent gout flare in the subsequent 28 to 30 days (RR 1.06; 95 % CI 0.59 to 1.92; p = 0.84). Adverse events were similar between groups. The included studies did not report time to achieve target serum urate, long-term adherence to ULT, or patient satisfaction with treatment.
There appears to be no evidence for harm or for benefit to initiating ULT during a gout flare. These findings have limited applicability to patients with tophaceous gout, or those with renal impairment.
痛风发作时开始降尿酸治疗(ULT)的最佳时机尚不确定。目的是对评估痛风发作期间开始ULT的效果的随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
本系统评价按照PRISMA方法进行。检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆中从数据库建立至2023年3月1日发表的研究。纳入了以英文发表的、研究18岁及以上成年人痛风发作期间开始ULT的RCT。使用修订的Cochrane偏倚风险工具2.0评估纳入研究的质量。提取以下结局的数据:患者自评疼痛评分、痛风发作持续时间、复发性痛风发作、达到目标血清尿酸的时间、ULT依从性、患者对治疗的满意度和不良事件。使用Review Manager v5.4进行荟萃分析。本研究已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42023404680。
共识别出972项研究,其中6项RCT符合纳入分析的标准。3项研究被评估为具有高偏倚风险,1项研究存在一些担忧,2项研究具有低偏倚风险。总共有445名汇总参与者;226名参与者被随机分配至早期开始ULT组,219名被分配至安慰剂组或延迟开始ULT组。3项研究使用了别嘌醇,2项研究使用了非布司他,1项研究使用了丙磺舒。很少有参与者(n = 62,13.9%)患有痛风石性痛风。大多数研究排除了肾功能损害的参与者。在基线、第3 - 4天、第7 - 8天、第10天或第14 - 15天,患者自评疼痛评分无差异(p≥0.42)。此外,痛风发作缓解时间(标准化均差0.77天;95%CI -0.26至1.79;p = 0.14)或随后28至30天复发性痛风发作风险无显著差异(RR 1.06;95%CI 0.59至1.92;p = 0.84)。两组不良事件相似。纳入研究未报告达到目标血清尿酸的时间、ULT长期依从性或患者对治疗的满意度。
痛风发作期间开始ULT似乎没有证据表明有害或有益。这些发现对痛风石性痛风患者或肾功能损害患者的适用性有限。