Suppr超能文献

一项多中心、随机、开放性研究,旨在比较西格列汀与维格列汀在二甲双胍单药治疗基础上的疗效差异

A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare the Effects of Gemigliptin Add-on or Escalation of Metformin Dose on Glycemic Control and Safety in Patients with Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Metformin and SGLT-2 Inhibitors (SO GOOD Study).

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Diabetes Res. 2024 Jan 5;2024:8915591. doi: 10.1155/2024/8915591. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare efficacy and safety between gemigliptin add-on and escalation of the metformin dose in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) despite treatment with metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors.

METHODS

This study was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group comparative study. Patients with T2DM uncontrolled on metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors were randomized to receive gemigliptin 50 mg as an add-on (GEM group, = 37) or escalation of the metformin dose (500 mg, MET group, = 38) for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to week 24.

RESULTS

At weeks 12 and 24, the reduction in HbA1c levels was significantly greater in the GEM group than in the MET group (GEM vs. MET = -0.64% ± 0.34% vs. -0.36% ± 0.50%, = 0.009 at week 12; -0.61% ± 0.35% vs. -0.33% ± 0.70%, = 0.045 at week 24). The proportions of patients who achieved target HbA1c levels of <7.0% at weeks 12 and 24 and <6.5% at week 12 were greater in the GEM group than in the MET group. An index of -cell function was also significantly improved in the GEM group. The safety profiles were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemigliptin add-on therapy may be more effective than metformin dose escalation in patients with T2DM insufficiently controlled using metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors, without safety concerns. This trial is registered with CRIS_number: KCT0003520.

摘要

背景

我们旨在比较在二甲双胍和 SGLT2 抑制剂治疗控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中,与二甲双胍剂量递增相比,西格列汀联合治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项多中心、随机、开放标签、活性对照、平行组比较研究。二甲双胍和 SGLT2 抑制剂控制不佳的 T2DM 患者被随机分为接受西格列汀 50mg 加用(GEM 组,n=37)或二甲双胍剂量递增(500mg,MET 组,n=38)治疗 24 周。主要终点是从基线到 24 周时糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的变化。

结果

在第 12 周和第 24 周,GEM 组 HbA1c 水平的降低明显大于 MET 组(GEM 组与 MET 组分别为-0.64%±0.34%比-0.36%±0.50%,=0.009,第 12 周;-0.61%±0.35%比-0.33%±0.70%,=0.045,第 24 周)。第 12 周和第 24 周达到 HbA1c 目标值<7.0%和<6.5%的患者比例在 GEM 组明显高于 MET 组。GEM 组胰岛细胞功能指数也明显改善。两组安全性相似。

结论

与二甲双胍剂量递增相比,西格列汀联合治疗可能在二甲双胍和 SGLT2 抑制剂控制不佳的 T2DM 患者中更有效,且无安全性问题。本试验已在 cris_number:KCT0003520 注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97fb/10787050/e7dd6f5ad7b5/JDR2024-8915591.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验