Rogers Leoandra Onnie, Kiang Lisa, White Lauren, Calzada Esther J, Umaña-Taylor Adriana J, Byrd Christy, Williams Chelsea Derlan, Marks Amy, Whitesell Nancy
Northwestern University.
Wake Forest University.
Res Hum Dev. 2020;17(2-3):130-153. doi: 10.1080/15427609.2020.1831881. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
Research on ethnic-racial identity (ERI) and its development has increased exponentially over the past decade. In this paper we discuss five questions that the Lifespan ERI Study Group grappled with in our effort propose a lifespan model of ERI: (1) When does ERI development begin and end? (2) How do we account for age-dependent and contextually-initiated factors in ERI? (3) Should there be a reference point for healthy ERI, and if so, what is it? (4) How do the multiplicities of identity (intersectionality, multiracialism, whiteness) figure into our conceptualization of ERI? (5) How do we understand the role of ERI in pursuit of equity, diversity, and social justice? We note that these are persistent questions in ERI research, and thus our goal is to present our collective reckoning with these issues as well as our ponderings about why they persist. We conclude with recommendations forthe kinds of research questions, designs, and methods that developmental science, in particular, needs to pursue.
在过去十年中,关于种族-民族认同(ERI)及其发展的研究呈指数级增长。在本文中,我们讨论了寿命期ERI研究小组在努力提出ERI寿命期模型时所面临的五个问题:(1)ERI发展何时开始和结束?(2)我们如何解释ERI中与年龄相关和情境引发的因素?(3)健康的ERI是否应该有一个参考点,如果有,是什么?(4)身份的多样性(交叉性、多种族主义、白人身份)如何融入我们对ERI的概念化?(5)我们如何理解ERI在追求公平、多样性和社会正义中的作用?我们注意到这些是ERI研究中持续存在的问题,因此我们的目标是呈现我们对这些问题的集体思考以及我们对它们为何持续存在的思考。我们最后针对发展科学尤其需要探索的研究问题、设计和方法提出了建议。