Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 29;14(1):e074125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074125.
Social capital (SC) has been shown to be inversely associated with elevated blood pressure. While SC in the workplace may also be associated with blood pressure, it has not been extensively studied. We aimed to investigate the association between workplace SC and systolic blood pressure (SBP).
A cross-sectional study.
367 small-sized and medium-sized companies in Japan.
A total of 23 173 participants (15 991 males and 7182 females) aged ≥18 years.
SC was assessed using individual responses to eight 4-point Likert questions used in the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire. Workplace SC was assessed as the mean of individual-level responses to the SC questions from those working in the same company.
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) RESULTS: A multilevel linear regression model revealed that higher workplace-level SC was linked with lower SBP (coef.=-0.53 per 1SD increment in workplace SC, 95% CI=-1.02 to -0.05) among females in the age-adjusted model, which remained statistically significant after adjusting for other covariates. After adjusting for individual-level SC, this association was attenuated and became non-significant (coef.=-0.41, 95% CI=-0.87 to 0.05), while individual-level SC was inversely associated with SBP (coef.=-0.43, 95% CI=-0.73 to -0.13). Among males, we did not find any evidence of significant inverse associations either in relation to workplace SC (coef.=-0.12, 95% CI=-0.46 to 0.21) or individual-level SC (coef.=0.19, 95% CI=-0.01 to 0.39).
Our study findings suggested that workplace-level SC can affect SBP differently by sex.
社会资本(SC)与血压升高呈负相关。虽然工作场所的 SC 也可能与血压有关,但尚未对此进行广泛研究。我们旨在调查工作场所 SC 与收缩压(SBP)之间的关系。
横断面研究。
日本 367 家中小型公司。
共有 23173 名参与者(15991 名男性和 7182 名女性),年龄≥18 岁。
SC 使用 Brief Job Stress Questionnaire 中的 8 个 4 分李克特问题的个体反应进行评估。工作场所 SC 通过对来自同一公司的个体对 SC 问题的个体反应的平均值进行评估。
收缩压(SBP)
多水平线性回归模型显示,在校正年龄后,在调整了其他协变量后,女性的工作场所 SC 水平较高与 SBP 较低相关(每 1SD 工作场所 SC 增加时的系数为-0.53,95%CI=-1.02 至-0.05),这在调整了个体水平的 SC 后仍然具有统计学意义。在调整了个体水平的 SC 后,这种关联减弱且变得不显著(系数为-0.41,95%CI=-0.87 至 0.05),而个体水平的 SC 与 SBP 呈负相关(系数为-0.43,95%CI=-0.73 至-0.13)。在男性中,我们没有发现任何证据表明工作场所 SC(系数为-0.12,95%CI=-0.46 至 0.21)或个体水平 SC(系数为 0.19,95%CI=-0.01 至 0.39)与 SBP 之间存在显著的负相关关系。
我们的研究结果表明,工作场所的 SC 可能通过性别对 SBP 产生不同的影响。