Oslo Economics, Klingenberggata 7, 0161, Oslo, Norway.
The Finnish Centre for Pensions, 00065, ELÄKETURVAKESKUS, Finland.
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Sep;25(7):1275-1289. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01664-w. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
This study evaluates a complex telemedicine-based intervention targeting patients with chronic health problems. Computer tablets and home telemonitoring devices are used by patients to report point-of-care measurements, e.g., blood pressure, blood glucose or oxygen saturation, and to answer health-related questions at a follow-up center. We designed a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare the telemedicine-based intervention with usual care in six local centers in Norway. The study outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) based on the EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), patient experiences, and utilization of healthcare. We also conducted a cost-benefit analysis to inform policy implementation, as well as a process evaluation (reported elsewhere). We used mixed methods to analyze data collected during the trial (health data, survey data and interviews with patients and health personnel) as well as data from national health registers. 735 patients were included during the period from February 2019 to June 2020. One year after inclusion, the effects on the use of healthcare services were mixed. The proportion of patients receiving home-based care services declined, but the number of GP contacts increased in the intervention group compared to the control group. Participants in the intervention group experienced improved HRQoL compared to the control group and were more satisfied with the follow-up of their health. The cost-benefit of the intervention depends largely on the design of the service and the value society places on improved safety and self-efficacy.
本研究评估了一项针对慢性健康问题患者的复杂远程医疗干预措施。患者使用平板电脑和家庭远程监测设备来报告即时护理测量结果,例如血压、血糖或血氧饱和度,并在随访中心回答与健康相关的问题。我们设计了一项实用的随机对照试验,将远程医疗干预与挪威六个当地中心的常规护理进行比较。研究结果包括基于 EuroQol 问卷 (EQ-5D-5L) 的健康相关生活质量 (HRQoL)、患者体验以及医疗保健的利用情况。我们还进行了成本效益分析,为政策实施提供信息,并进行了过程评估(另见报道)。我们使用混合方法分析了试验期间收集的数据(健康数据、调查数据以及患者和卫生人员的访谈)以及来自国家健康登记的数据。2019 年 2 月至 2020 年 6 月期间共纳入 735 名患者。纳入一年后,对医疗服务利用的影响喜忧参半。与对照组相比,干预组接受家庭护理服务的患者比例下降,但接受全科医生就诊的患者数量增加。与对照组相比,干预组的参与者体验到了更高的 HRQoL,对健康随访的满意度更高。干预措施的成本效益在很大程度上取决于服务的设计和社会对提高安全性和自我效能的重视程度。