Alsaab Mohammed, Alsadun Abdulrhman S, Alrsheed Eyad, Almutairi Khaled, Alkhudhayr Abdullah, Alharbi Meshari A, Alghamdi Waleed, Solyman Omar
Optometry, Qassim University Medical City, Buraydah, SAU.
Ophthalmology, Qassim University, Buraydah, SAU.
Cureus. 2024 Jan 2;16(1):e51503. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51503. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Introduction This study proposes the utility of an infrared auto refractometer for meibography and compares miebographs obtained by an auto refractometer to meibographs obtained by a designated meibography machine. Methods A prospective observational comparative study of meibographs of patients with clinical signs of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) using a designated meibography machine and an infrared auto refractometer. Five masked, experienced interpreters graded the images of the two machines. The Kappa test was used to calculate Intra-rater and inter-rater agreements between the meibography machine and automated refractor grading of meibomian gland dysfunction. Results High-quality photos of all 30 eyes delineating the meibomian glands (MG) were successfully obtained with both the meibography machine and the autorefractor. Both methods had a good intra-rater agreement (κ= 0.667 to 0.784, average 0.738). Poor to fair interrater agreement was noticed in the grading of autorefractor images (k= -0.030 to 0.343, average 0.092) and poor to moderate agreements between investigators for meibography machine images (K= -0.016 to 0.420, average 0.173). Conclusion A commercially available auto refractometer could capture high-quality non-contact IR digital meibographs.
引言 本研究提出了一种红外自动验光仪用于睑板腺造影的效用,并将自动验光仪获得的睑板腺造影与指定睑板腺造影机获得的睑板腺造影进行比较。方法 采用指定睑板腺造影机和红外自动验光仪对有睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)临床体征的患者进行睑板腺造影的前瞻性观察比较研究。五名经验丰富的蒙面口译员对两台机器的图像进行评分。使用Kappa检验计算睑板腺造影机与自动验光仪对睑板腺功能障碍分级之间的评分者内和评分者间一致性。结果 使用睑板腺造影机和自动验光仪均成功获得了所有30只眼睛描绘睑板腺(MG)的高质量照片。两种方法均具有良好的评分者内一致性(κ = 0.667至0.784,平均0.738)。在自动验光仪图像分级中观察到评分者间一致性较差至中等(k = -0.030至0.343,平均0.092),在睑板腺造影机图像方面,研究者之间的一致性较差至中等(K = -0.016至0.420,平均0.173)。结论 市售的自动验光仪可以捕获高质量的非接触式红外数字睑板腺造影照片。