Suppr超能文献

纳武利尤单抗和雷莫芦单抗治疗晚期黑色素瘤的总生存期和应答率。

Overall Survival and Response with Nivolumab and Relatlimab in Advanced Melanoma.

机构信息

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney.

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.

出版信息

NEJM Evid. 2023 Apr;2(4):EVIDoa2200239. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2200239. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A phase 2/3 trial — A Study of Relatlimab Plus Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Participants With Advanced Melanoma (RELATIVITY-047) — evaluated nivolumab + relatlimab as a fixed-dose combination and found a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit over nivolumab monotherapy in previously untreated unresectable or metastatic melanoma. We now report updated PFS and safety data and the first results for overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive nivolumab 480 mg and relatlimab 160 mg fixed-dose combination or nivolumab 480 mg alone, given intravenously every 4 weeks. PFS (primary end point) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, was assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points, tested hierarchically, were OS and then ORR per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, per BICR. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 19.3 months, median PFS according to BICR was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5 to 14.8) with nivolumab + relatlimab versus 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.4) with nivolumab (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.94). Median OS was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 34.2 to NR) with nivolumab + relatlimab versus 34.1 months (95% CI, 25.2 to NR) with nivolumab (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.01; P=0.059) (prespecified value for statistical significance, P≤0.043). ORRs per BICR were 43.1% (95% CI, 37.9 to 48.4) versus 32.6% (95% CI, 27.8 to 37.7), respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 21.1% of patients treated with nivolumab + relatlimab versus 11.1% treated with nivolumab. CONCLUSIONS: The fixed-dose combination of nivolumab + relatlimab showed consistent PFS benefit versus nivolumab with approximately 6 months of additional median follow-up. The combination treatment did not reach the preplanned statistical threshold for OS, with a 10.3 percentage-point difference in ORR. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with nivolumab + relatlimab versus nivolumab. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03470922.)

摘要

背景

一项 2/3 期试验——Relatlimab 联合纳武利尤单抗与纳武利尤单抗单药治疗晚期黑色素瘤的比较(RELATIVITY-047)——评估了纳武利尤单抗+relatlimab 作为固定剂量组合的效果,与纳武利尤单抗单药治疗相比,在未经治疗的不可切除或转移性黑色素瘤患者中显示出显著的无进展生存期(PFS)获益。我们现在报告更新的 PFS 和安全性数据,以及总生存期(OS)和客观缓解率(ORR)的首次结果。

方法

患者按 1:1 随机分配,接受纳武利尤单抗 480mg 和 relatlimab 160mg 固定剂量组合或纳武利尤单抗 480mg 单药治疗,每 4 周静脉输注一次。根据实体瘤反应评估标准 1.1 版(RECIST 1.1)评估盲法独立中心评估(BICR)的 PFS(主要终点)。次要终点按层次测试,首先是 OS,然后是 BICR 评估的根据 RECIST 1.1 版的 ORR。

结果

在中位随访 19.3 个月时,根据 BICR,纳武利尤单抗+relatlimab 的中位 PFS 为 10.2 个月(95%置信区间[CI],6.5 至 14.8),而纳武利尤单抗的中位 PFS 为 4.6 个月(95%CI,3.5 至 6.4)(风险比,0.78;95%CI,0.64 至 0.94)。纳武利尤单抗+relatlimab 的中位 OS 未达到(NR)(95%CI,34.2 至 NR),而纳武利尤单抗的中位 OS 为 34.1 个月(95%CI,25.2 至 NR)(风险比,0.80;95%CI,0.64 至 1.01;P=0.059)(预设的统计学显著性值,P≤0.043)。BICR 评估的 ORR 分别为 43.1%(95%CI,37.9 至 48.4)和 32.6%(95%CI,27.8 至 37.7)。纳武利尤单抗+relatlimab 治疗的患者中有 21.1%发生 3/4 级治疗相关不良事件,而纳武利尤单抗治疗的患者中有 11.1%发生。

结论

纳武利尤单抗+relatlimab 的固定剂量组合与纳武利尤单抗相比,在 PFS 方面持续获益,额外的中位随访时间约为 6 个月。联合治疗在 OS 方面未达到预先设定的统计学阈值,ORR 差异为 10.3 个百分点。与纳武利尤单抗相比,纳武利尤单抗+relatlimab 治疗的患者更常发生 3/4 级治疗相关不良事件。(由 Bristol Myers Squibb 资助;临床试验编号,NCT03470922。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验