Suppr超能文献

成人脓毒性休克患者低剂量氢化可的松的患者水平荟萃分析。

Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Low-Dose Hydrocortisone in Adults with Septic Shock.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.

General Intensive Care Unit, Raymond Poincaré Hospital (APHP), Garches, France.

出版信息

NEJM Evid. 2023 Jun;2(6):EVIDoa2300034. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300034. Epub 2023 May 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trials and study-level meta-analyses have failed to resolve the role of corticosteroids in the management of patients with septic shock. Patient-level meta-analyses may provide more precise estimates of treatment effects, particularly subgroup effects. METHODS: We pooled individual patient data from septic shock trials investigating the adjunctive use of intravenous hydrocortisone. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality, and it was also analyzed across predefined subgroups. Secondary outcomes included mortality at intensive care unit and hospital discharge, at 28 and 180 days, and vasopressor-, ventilator-, and organ failure–free days. Adverse events included superinfection, muscle weakness, hyperglycemia, hypernatremia, and gastroduodenal bleeding. RESULTS: Of 24 eligible trials (n=8528), 17 (n=7882) provided individual patient data, and 7 (n=5929) provided 90-day mortality. The marginal relative risk (RR) for 90-day mortality of hydrocortisone versus placebo was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.04; P=0.22; moderate certainty). It was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.92) for hydrocortisone with fludrocortisone and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.12) without fludrocortisone. There was no significant differential treatment effect across subgroups. Hydrocortisone was associated with little to no difference in any of the secondary outcomes except vasopressor-free days (mean difference, 1.24 days; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.73; high certainty). Hydrocortisone may not be associated with an increase in the risk of superinfection (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.15; low certainty), hyperglycemia (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.12; low certainty), or gastroduodenal bleeding (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.48; low certainty). Hydrocortisone may be associated with an increase in the risk of hypernatremia (RR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.56 to 2.60; low certainty) and muscle weakness (n=2647; RR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.49 to 1.99; low certainty). CONCLUSIONS: In this patient-level meta-analysis, hydrocortisone compared with placebo was not associated with reduced mortality for patients with septic shock. (Funded by “Programme d’Investissements d’Avenir,” a research Professorship from the National Institute of Health and Care Research, Leadership Fellowships from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, and Emerging Leaders Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia; PROSPERO registration number, CRD42017062198.)

摘要

背景

试验和研究水平的荟萃分析未能解决皮质类固醇在脓毒性休克患者治疗中的作用。患者水平的荟萃分析可能提供更精确的治疗效果估计,特别是亚组效果。

方法

我们从研究辅助静脉应用氢化可的松治疗脓毒性休克的试验中汇总了个体患者数据。主要结局是 90 天全因死亡率,也在预先设定的亚组中进行了分析。次要结局包括 ICU 出院和医院出院、28 天和 180 天的死亡率,以及血管加压素、呼吸机和器官衰竭无天数。不良事件包括继发感染、肌肉无力、高血糖、高钠血症和胃十二指肠出血。

结果

在 24 项符合条件的试验(n=8528)中,17 项(n=7882)提供了个体患者数据,7 项(n=5929)提供了 90 天死亡率。与安慰剂相比,氢化可的松治疗 90 天死亡率的边缘相对风险(RR)为 0.93(95%置信区间[CI],0.82 至 1.04;P=0.22;中等确定性)。氢化可的松联合氟氢可的松的 RR 为 0.86(95% CI,0.79 至 0.92),而不联合氟氢可的松的 RR 为 0.96(95% CI,0.82 至 1.12)。各亚组间无显著的治疗效果差异。除血管加压素无天数(平均差异,1.24 天;95% CI,0.74 至 1.73;高确定性)外,氢化可的松与任何次要结局均无显著差异。氢化可的松可能不会增加继发感染(RR,1.04;95% CI,0.95 至 1.15;低确定性)、高血糖(RR,1.05;95% CI,0.98 至 1.12;低确定性)或胃十二指肠出血(RR,1.11;95% CI,0.83 至 1.48;低确定性)的风险。氢化可的松可能会增加高钠血症(RR,2.01;95% CI,1.56 至 2.60;低确定性)和肌肉无力(n=2647;RR,1.73;95% CI,1.49 至 1.99;低确定性)的风险。

结论

在这项患者水平的荟萃分析中,与安慰剂相比,氢化可的松并未降低脓毒性休克患者的死亡率。(由“未来投资计划”、国家卫生与保健研究研究所研究教授、澳大利亚国家卫生与保健研究理事会领导奖学金和澳大利亚国家卫生与保健研究理事会新兴领导者奖学金资助;PROSPERO 注册号,CRD42017062198。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验