Suppr超能文献

基于价值的药物福利转换后出现的急性糖尿病并发症。

Acute Diabetes Complications After Transition to a Value-Based Medication Benefit.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Feb 2;5(2):e235309. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5309.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The association of value-based medication benefits with diabetes health outcomes is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of a preventive drug list (PDL) value-based medication benefit with acute, preventable diabetes complications.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used a controlled interrupted time series design and analyzed data from a large, national, commercial health plan from January 1, 2004, through June 30, 2017, for patients with diabetes aged 12 to 64 years enrolled through employers that adopted PDLs (intervention group) and matched and weighted members with diabetes whose employers did not adopt PDLs (control group). All participants were continuously enrolled and analyzed for 1 year before and after the index date. Subgroup analysis assessed patients with diabetes living in lower-income and higher-income neighborhoods. Data analysis was performed between August 19, 2020, and December 1, 2023.

EXPOSURE

At the index date, intervention group members experienced employer-mandated enrollment in a PDL benefit that was added to their follow-up year health plan. This benefit reduced out-of-pocket costs for common cardiometabolic drugs, including noninsulin antidiabetic agents and insulin. Matched control group members continued to have cardiometabolic medications subject to deductibles or co-payments at follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was acute, preventable diabetes complications (eg, bacterial infections, neurovascular events, acute coronary disease, and diabetic ketoacidosis) measured as complication days per 1000 members per year. Intermediate measures included the proportion of days covered by and higher use (mean of 1 or more 30-day fills per month) of antidiabetic agents.

RESULTS

The study 10 588 patients in the intervention group (55.2% male; mean [SD] age, 51.1 [10.1] years) and 690 075 patients in the control group (55.2% male; mean [SD] age, 51.1 [10.1] years) after matching and weighting. From baseline to follow-up, the proportion of days covered by noninsulin antidiabetic agents increased by 4.7% (95% CI, 3.2%-6.2%) in the PDL group and by 7.3% (95% CI, 5.1%-9.5%) among PDL members from lower-income areas compared with controls. Higher use of noninsulin antidiabetic agents increased by 11.3% (95% CI, 8.2%-14.5%) in the PDL group and by 15.2% (95% CI, 10.6%-19.8%) among members of the PDL group from lower-income areas compared with controls. The PDL group experienced an 8.4% relative reduction in complication days (95% CI, -13.9% to -2.8%; absolute reduction, -20.2 [95% CI, -34.3 to -6.2] per 1000 members per year) compared with controls from baseline to follow-up, while PDL members residing in lower-income areas had a 10.2% relative reduction (95% CI, -17.4% to -3.0%; absolute, -26.1 [95% CI, -45.8 to -6.5] per 1000 members per year).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, acute, preventable diabetes complication days decreased by 8.4% in the overall PDL group and by 10.2% among PDL members from lower-income areas compared with the control group. The results may support a strategy of incentivizing adoption of targeted cost-sharing reductions among commercially insured patients with diabetes and lower income to enhance health outcomes.

摘要

重要性

药物福利的基于价值的药物与糖尿病健康结果之间的关联尚不确定。

目的

评估预防性药物清单 (PDL) 基于价值的药物福利与急性、可预防的糖尿病并发症之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究采用了对照中断时间序列设计,并分析了 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 30 日期间从全国性大型商业健康计划中获得的数据,这些数据来自雇主采用 PDL(干预组)并匹配和加权的 12 至 64 岁患有糖尿病且雇主未采用 PDL 的患者(对照组)。所有参与者在索引日期前后连续登记和分析 1 年。亚组分析评估了居住在低收入和高收入社区的糖尿病患者。数据分析于 2020 年 8 月 19 日至 2023 年 12 月 1 日之间进行。

暴露

在索引日期,干预组的成员经历了雇主强制参加他们的随访年健康计划的 PDL 福利。这项福利降低了常见的心血管代谢药物(包括非胰岛素抗糖尿病药物和胰岛素)的自付费用。匹配的对照组成员在随访时继续服用心血管代谢药物,需要支付免赔额或共付额。

主要结果和测量

主要结果是急性、可预防的糖尿病并发症(例如细菌感染、神经血管事件、急性冠状动脉疾病和糖尿病酮症酸中毒),以每年每 1000 名成员的并发症天数来衡量。中间措施包括抗糖尿病药物的覆盖率比例和更高的使用量(每月 1 个或更多 30 天的填充量的平均值)。

结果

这项研究包括干预组的 10588 名患者(55.2%为男性;平均[SD]年龄为 51.1[10.1]岁)和对照组的 690075 名患者(55.2%为男性;平均[SD]年龄为 51.1[10.1]岁),在匹配和加权后。从基线到随访,PDL 组非胰岛素抗糖尿病药物的覆盖率比例增加了 4.7%(95%CI,3.2%-6.2%),PDL 组来自低收入地区的成员增加了 7.3%(95%CI,5.1%-9.5%)与对照组相比。非胰岛素抗糖尿病药物的更高使用率增加了 11.3%(95%CI,8.2%-14.5%),PDL 组来自低收入地区的成员增加了 15.2%(95%CI,10.6%-19.8%)与对照组相比。PDL 组与对照组相比,从基线到随访,并发症天数相对减少了 8.4%(95%CI,-13.9%至-2.8%;绝对减少 20.2[95%CI,-34.3 至-6.2]每 1000 名成员每年),而居住在低收入地区的 PDL 成员的相对减少了 10.2%(95%CI,-17.4%至-3.0%;绝对减少 26.1[95%CI,-45.8 至-6.5]每 1000 名成员每年)。

结论和相关性

在这项队列研究中,总体 PDL 组的急性、可预防的糖尿病并发症天数减少了 8.4%,而来自低收入地区的 PDL 组成员减少了 10.2%与对照组相比。结果可能支持在商业投保的糖尿病和低收入患者中实施有针对性的成本分担降低策略,以改善健康结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e6/10858396/5c0f6253865e/jamahealthforum-e235309-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验