Suppr超能文献

评估在配备HyperArc的TrueBeam直线加速器中,机器性能检查作为温斯顿-卢茨质量保证测试替代方法的有效性。

Evaluating the Efficacy of Machine Performance Checks as an Alternative to Winston-Lutz Quality Assurance Testing in the TrueBeam Linear Accelerator with HyperArc.

作者信息

Kim Eun Kyu, Kim Sung Yeop, Park Jae Won, Park Jaehyeon, Yea Ji Woon, Jo Yoon Young, Oh Se An

机构信息

Department of Physics, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu 42415, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 13;14(4):410. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14040410.

Abstract

HyperArc is a preferred technique for treating brain metastases, employing a single isocenter for multiple lesions. Geometrical isocentricity in the TrueBeam linear accelerator with HyperArc is crucial. We evaluated machine performance checks (MPCs) as an alternative to the Winston-Lutz (WL) test to verify the treatment isocenter. Between January and July 2023, we assessed 53 data points using MPC and Winston-Lutz tests. The isocenter size obtained from the MPC and its sum, including the rotation-induced couch shift, were compared with the maximum total delta value from the Winston-Lutz test. The maximum total delta was 0.68 ± 0.10 mm, while the isocenter size was 0.28 ± 0.02 mm. The sum of the isocenter size and rotation-induced couch shift measured by MPC was 0.61 ± 0.03 mm. During the Winston-Lutz test (without couch rotation), the maximum total delta value was 0.56 ± 0.13 mm. A -test analysis revealed a significant difference in the isocenter size averages between the Winston-Lutz and MPC outcomes, whereas the Pearson's correlation coefficient yielded no correlation. Our study highlights the necessity for separate MPC and Winston-Lutz tests for isocenter verification. Therefore, the Winston-Lutz test should precede stereotactic radiosurgery for isocenter verification.

摘要

HyperArc是治疗脑转移瘤的一种优选技术,它采用单个等中心来治疗多个病灶。在配备HyperArc的TrueBeam直线加速器中,几何等中心性至关重要。我们评估了机器性能检查(MPC)作为温斯顿-卢茨(WL)测试的替代方法,以验证治疗等中心。在2023年1月至7月期间,我们使用MPC和温斯顿-卢茨测试评估了53个数据点。将从MPC获得的等中心尺寸及其总和(包括旋转引起的治疗床位移)与温斯顿-卢茨测试的最大总偏差值进行比较。最大总偏差为0.68±0.10毫米,而等中心尺寸为0.28±0.02毫米。通过MPC测量的等中心尺寸与旋转引起的治疗床位移之和为0.61±0.03毫米。在温斯顿-卢茨测试期间(无治疗床旋转),最大总偏差值为0.56±0.13毫米。A检验分析显示,温斯顿-卢茨测试和MPC结果之间的等中心尺寸平均值存在显著差异,而皮尔逊相关系数显示无相关性。我们的研究强调了进行单独的MPC和温斯顿-卢茨测试以验证等中心的必要性。因此,在进行立体定向放射外科手术以验证等中心之前,应先进行温斯顿-卢茨测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be9f/10887750/7e846666add5/diagnostics-14-00410-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验