Suppr超能文献

维生素 E:不仅是单一的立体异构体。

Vitamin E: Not only a single stereoisomer.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Experimental Medicine, University of Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

Free Radic Biol Med. 2024 Mar;215:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2024.02.013. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

Abstract

The recent publication by Azzi and colleagues puts forth the argument that only RRR-α-tocopherol should be considered as vitamin E from a physiological point of view. They base their argument primarily on the assertion that only this form has been used to treat stark vitamin E deficiency in humans (known as AVED, or Ataxia with Vitamin E Deficiency). Azzi et al. also argue that other chemically similar molecules, such as tocopherols other than α-tocopherol and tocotrienols do not provide vitamin E activity. Azzi and colleagues are correct on this second point. An investigation into the biological activities of vitamin E, and the mechanisms behind these activities, confirms that physiological vitamin E activity is limited to certain α-tocopherol forms. However, it is also clear that these activities are not restricted only to the RRR-form but include other 2R-forms as well. Indeed, the α-tocopherol transfer protein (α-TTP), which is critical to mediate vitamin E trafficking and biological activity, and genetic defects of which lead to vitamin E deficiency, binds well to all 2R-forms of α-tocopherol. Furthermore, both RRR-α-tocopherol and the other 2R-forms are maintained in human plasma and distributed to tissues and organs, whereas the 2S-stereoisomers are excreted quickly. As such, in recent years the definition of vitamin E including both 2R- and RRR-α-tocopherol has gained both broad scientific and regulatory acceptance. Consistent with this understanding, we provide evidence that AVED has indeed been treated successfully with forms in addition to RRR-α-tocopherol, again arguing against the restriction of the definition to RRR-α-tocopherol only. Finally, we provide evidence against any safety concerns utilizing the currently accepted definition of vitamin E.

摘要

最近,Azzi 及其同事发表的一篇文章提出,从生理学角度来看,只有 RRR-α-生育酚才应被视为维生素 E。他们的观点主要基于这样一种断言,即只有这种形式的生育酚曾被用于治疗人类严重的维生素 E 缺乏症(称为 AVED,即维生素 E 缺乏性共济失调)。Azzi 等人还认为,其他化学结构相似的分子,如非 α-生育酚的生育酚和三烯生育酚,不具有维生素 E 的活性。Azzi 及其同事在这第二点上是正确的。对维生素 E 的生物学活性及其背后的机制进行研究,证实了生理维生素 E 活性仅限于某些 α-生育酚形式。然而,也很明显,这些活性不仅限于 RRR 形式,还包括其他 2R 形式。事实上,对介导维生素 E 转运和生物活性至关重要的α-生育酚转移蛋白(α-TTP),其遗传缺陷会导致维生素 E 缺乏,与所有 2R 形式的 α-生育酚都结合良好。此外,RRR-α-生育酚和其他 2R 形式都在人血浆中得以维持,并分布到组织和器官中,而 2S 对映异构体则很快被排泄。因此,近年来,包括 2R 和 RRR-α-生育酚在内的维生素 E 的定义得到了广泛的科学和监管认可。基于这一理解,我们提供了证据表明,除了 RRR-α-生育酚外,AVED 确实已经成功地用其他形式进行了治疗,再次反对将定义仅限于 RRR-α-生育酚。最后,我们提供了证据,反对任何使用目前被接受的维生素 E 定义的安全担忧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验