Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间的治理与公共卫生决策:一项范围综述

Governance and Public Health Decision-Making During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Asthana Sumegha, Mukherjee Sanjana, Phelan Alexandra L, Standley Claire J

机构信息

Center for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.

Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Public Health Rev. 2024 Feb 16;45:1606095. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1606095. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

We provide an in-depth understanding of how governance and decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic has been empirically characterized in the literature to identify gaps in research and highlight areas that require further inquiry. We searched peer-reviewed publications using empirical data published between Jan 1, 2020 and Jan 31, 2022 in three electronic databases to examine the process of governance and decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. Two authors independently screened the records and 24 publications were extracted for the review. Governance is analyzed by its level at national, sub-national, community and by its aspects of process, determinants and performance. While different methodological approaches are used, governance is conceptualized in four ways 1) characteristics and elements, 2) leadership, 3) application of power and 4) models or arrangements of governance. For future pandemic preparedness, there is a need for more empirical research using a unified conceptual approach to governance, which integrates decision-making processes and can guide governance structures and mechanisms across different countries and contexts. We call for more inclusivity in who performs the research on governance and where.

摘要

我们深入了解了新冠疫情期间治理与决策在文献中的实证特征,以识别研究空白并突出需要进一步探究的领域。我们检索了三个电子数据库中2020年1月1日至2022年1月31日期间发表的使用实证数据的同行评审出版物,以考察新冠疫情期间的治理与决策过程。两位作者独立筛选记录,提取了24篇出版物进行综述。从国家、次国家、社区层面以及过程、决定因素和绩效等方面对治理进行了分析。虽然使用了不同的方法论方法,但治理从以下四种方式进行概念化:1)特征与要素;2)领导力;3)权力应用;4)治理模式或安排。为了未来的疫情防范,需要更多采用统一概念化治理方法的实证研究,这种方法整合决策过程,并能指导不同国家和背景下的治理结构与机制。我们呼吁在治理研究的执行者以及研究地点方面要有更大的包容性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70fb/10904583/99b340644bb1/phrs-45-1606095-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验