Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Jul;104:205-216. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.12.081. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
This Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) sought to evaluate the efficacy of different endovascular treatments for femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis (FP-ISR).
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of science for clinical trials from database inception to March 31, 2023, with no language restrictions to retrieve randomized controlled trials or cohort studies evaluating the impact of any kind of endovascular treatments for FP-ISR. Pair-wise meta-analysis and Bayesian NMA were performed to pool the outcome estimates different endovascular treatments. The primary end points under consideration were primary patency rates at both 6-month and 12-month follow-up.
A total of 15 studies with 1,424 patients were ultimately enrolled to be analyzed, 7 types of endovascular treatment were identified for comparison. In terms of primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6-month and12-month follow-up, the direct meta-analysis findings showed that drug-coated balloons (DCB) and covered stent (CS) are considerably superior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), Excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) + DCB is significantly better than DCB. According to the meta-analysis based on Bayesian theory, during the 6-month and 12-months follow-up, we could not find significant difference between the different treatments in terms of the primary patency and the freedom from TLR, based on the surface values under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), CS was considered the best treatment in terms of primary patency (6 months SUCRA = 85.2; 12 months SUCRA = 78.9) and freedom from TLR (6 months SUCRA = 84.9; 12 months SUCRA = 70.9); directional atherectomy + POBA may lead to higher survival rate at 12 months (SUCRA = 89.1) than others treatments; in addition, both ELA + POBA and ELA + DCB have higher limb salvage than POBA.
The findings of this NMA suggest that CS showed positive encouraging results in primary patency and TLR in FP-ISR at 6 and 12 months. However, due to the potential influence of certain confounding factors, the long-term results necessitate validation through numerous randomized controlled trials.
本贝叶斯网状meta 分析(NMA)旨在评估不同腔内治疗技术在股腘动脉支架内再狭窄(FP-ISR)中的疗效。
从数据库建立到 2023 年 3 月 31 日,我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 Web of Science 中所有临床试验,无语言限制,以检索评价任何类型腔内治疗 FP-ISR 影响的随机对照试验或队列研究。采用两两荟萃分析和贝叶斯 NMA 汇总不同腔内治疗的结局估计值。主要终点是 6 个月和 12 个月随访时的一期通畅率。
最终纳入 15 项研究共 1424 例患者进行分析,共确定 7 种腔内治疗方法进行比较。在 6 个月和 12 个月随访时的一期通畅率和免于靶病变血运重建(TLR)方面,直接荟萃分析结果显示,药物涂层球囊(DCB)和覆膜支架(CS)明显优于单纯球囊血管成形术(POBA),准分子激光斑块切除术(ELA)+DCB 明显优于 DCB。基于贝叶斯理论的荟萃分析显示,在 6 个月和 12 个月随访时,不同治疗方法在一期通畅率和免于 TLR 方面的差异均无统计学意义,根据累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)表面值,CS 在一期通畅率(6 个月 SUCRA=85.2;12 个月 SUCRA=78.9)和免于 TLR(6 个月 SUCRA=84.9;12 个月 SUCRA=70.9)方面被认为是最佳治疗方法;定向斑块切除术+POBA 可能导致 12 个月时的生存率高于其他治疗方法(SUCRA=89.1);此外,ELA+POBA 和 ELA+DCB 的保肢率均高于 POBA。
本 NMA 的结果表明,CS 在 FP-ISR 的 6 个月和 12 个月时在一期通畅率和 TLR 方面显示出积极的结果。然而,由于某些混杂因素的潜在影响,需要通过大量的随机对照试验来验证长期结果。