Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
CJEM. 2024 May;26(5):327-332. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00676-6. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
Acute atrial fibrillation (AF)/flutter (AFL) is a common emergency department (ED) presentation. In 2021, an updated version of CAEP's Acute AF/AFL Best Practices Checklist was published, seeking to guide management. We assessed the alignment with and safety of application of the Checklist, regarding stroke prevention and disposition.
This health records review included adults presenting to two tertiary care academic EDs between January and August 2022 with a diagnosis of acute AF/AFL. Patients were excluded if their initial heart rate was < 100 or if they were hospitalized. Data extracted included: demographics, CHADS-65 score, clinical characteristics, ED treatment and disposition, and outpatient prescriptions and referrals. Our primary outcome was the proportion of patient encounters with one or more identified safety issues. Each case was assessed according to seven predetermined criteria from elements of the CAEP Checklist and either deemed "safe" or to contain one or more safety issues. We used descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals.
358 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 66.9 years, 59.2% were male and 77.4% patients had at least one of the CHADS-65 criteria. 169 (47.2%) were not already on anticoagulation and 99 (27.6%) were discharged home with a new prescription for anticoagulation. The primary outcome was identified in 6.4% (95% CI 4.3-9.5) of encounters, representing 28 safety issues in 23 individuals. The safety concerns included: failure to prescribe anticoagulation when indicated (n = 6), inappropriate dosing of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) (n = 2), inappropriate prescription of rate or rhythm control medication (n = 9), and failure to recommend appropriately timed follow-up for new rate control medication (n = 11).
There was a very high level of ED physician alignment with CAEP's Best Practices Checklist regarding disposition and stroke prevention. There are opportunities to further improve care with respect to recommendation of anticoagulation and reducing inappropriate prescriptions of rate or rhythm medications.
急性心房颤动(AF)/扑动(AFL)是急诊科(ED)常见的急症。2021 年,CAEP 的急性 AF/AFL 最佳实践清单的更新版本发布,旨在指导管理。我们评估了该清单在预防中风和处置方面的应用是否符合标准以及是否安全。
本病历回顾纳入了 2022 年 1 月至 8 月期间在两家三级护理学术 ED 就诊、诊断为急性 AF/AFL 的成年人。如果患者的初始心率<100 或住院,则排除在外。提取的数据包括:人口统计学数据、CHADS-65 评分、临床特征、ED 治疗和处置、以及门诊处方和转诊。我们的主要结果是出现一个或多个确定的安全问题的患者就诊比例。根据 CAEP 清单的七个预定标准对每个病例进行评估,判定为“安全”或存在一个或多个安全问题。我们使用描述性统计和 95%置信区间。
358 名患者符合纳入标准。平均年龄为 66.9 岁,59.2%为男性,77.4%的患者至少有一个 CHADS-65 标准。169 名(47.2%)患者未接受抗凝治疗,99 名(27.6%)患者出院并开了新的抗凝处方。主要结果在 6.4%(95%CI 4.3-9.5)的就诊中被识别,代表 23 名患者中的 28 个安全问题。安全问题包括:在有指征时未开具抗凝药物(n=6)、直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)剂量不当(n=2)、开具节律或心率控制药物不当(n=9),以及未建议新的心率控制药物适当的随访时间(n=11)。
ED 医生在处置和预防中风方面非常符合 CAEP 的最佳实践清单。在推荐抗凝和减少节律或心率药物的不当处方方面,还有进一步改善的机会。