Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, USA; Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, USA.
Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, USA; Dornsife Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, USA; Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, USA; Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, USA.
Appetite. 2024 Jul 1;198:107323. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107323. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
The COVID-19 pandemic brought increases in food insecurity in Los Angeles (L.A.) County, defined as lacking household access to adequate food because of limited money or other resources. Here, we aimed to understand the lived experiences of food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath. In August-December 2022, we interviewed 30 residents of L.A. County who were participants in an ongoing internet panel and had reported experiencing food insecurity between April 2020 and July 2021. A stratified-sampling approach was used to recruit a diverse sample with and without government food assistance. We report five key findings, which underscore the stress and worry associated with the experience of food insecurity, and the coping strategies people implemented: (1) The pandemic prompted food insecurity as well as stressful shifts in eating behaviors compared to before the pandemic, with some eating much less food, some eating less nutritious food, and some eating much more due to being stuck at home; (2) Buying food became more effortful and financially challenging; (3) Government food assistance from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) was important for reducing food insecurity, but was sometimes insufficient, inconsistent, and didn't cover all retailers or food items; (4) Interviewees had to rely on their social networks, food banks or pantries, churches, and schools to meet their food needs and cope with food insecurity, but some faced barriers in doing so; (5) For some, food insecurity was worse in late 2022, almost two years after the pandemic started. We conclude with implications for policymakers and practitioners, emphasizing the importance of meeting the needs of diverse residents and addressing food insecurity in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.
COVID-19 大流行导致洛杉矶县(L.A.)的粮食不安全状况加剧,这是指由于资金或其他资源有限,家庭无法获得足够的食物。在这里,我们旨在了解 COVID-19 大流行期间及其后粮食不安全的实际经历。2022 年 8 月至 12 月,我们采访了 30 名洛杉矶县居民,他们是一个正在进行的互联网小组的参与者,并报告在 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 7 月期间经历过粮食不安全。采用分层抽样方法招募了一个有和没有政府食品援助的多样化样本。我们报告了五个关键发现,这些发现强调了与粮食不安全相关的压力和担忧,以及人们实施的应对策略:(1)与大流行前相比,大流行促使粮食不安全,并导致饮食行为发生压力性转变,有些人吃得更少,有些人吃得营养更少,有些人则因被困在家里而吃得更多;(2)购买食物变得更加费力和具有财务挑战性;(3)补充营养援助计划(SNAP)等政府食品援助对于减少粮食不安全很重要,但有时不足、不一致,并且不能涵盖所有零售商或食品;(4)受访者必须依靠他们的社交网络、食品银行或食品储藏室、教堂和学校来满足他们的食物需求并应对粮食不安全,但有些人在这样做时面临障碍;(5)对于一些人来说,2022 年底,即大流行开始近两年后,粮食不安全状况更糟。我们最后提出了对政策制定者和从业者的影响,强调满足不同居民需求和解决 COVID-19 大流行后粮食不安全问题的重要性。