Fleming Derek, Bozyel Ibrahim, Koscianski Christina A, Ozdemir Dilara, Karau Melissa J, Cuello Luz, Anoy Md Monzurul Islam, Gelston Suzanne, Schuetz Audrey N, Greenwood-Quaintance Kerryl E, Mandrekar Jayawant N, Beyenal Haluk, Patel Robin
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
The Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.
bioRxiv. 2024 Mar 19:2024.03.19.585100. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.19.585100.
Wound infections, exacerbated by the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens, necessitate innovative antimicrobial approaches. Polymicrobial infections, often involving and methicillin-resistant (MRSA), present formidable challenges due to biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance. Hypochlorous acid (HOCl), a potent antimicrobial agent produced naturally by the immune system, holds promise as an alternative therapy. An electrochemical bandage (e-bandage) that generates HOCl was evaluated for treatment of murine wound biofilm infections containing both MRSA and with "difficult-to-treat" resistance. Previously, the HOCl-producing e-bandage was shown to reduce wound biofilms containing alone. Compared to non-polarized e-bandage (no HOCl production) and Tegaderm only controls, the polarized e-bandages reduced bacterial loads in wounds infected with MRSA plus (MRSA: vs Tegaderm only - 1.4 log CFU/g, p = 0.0015, vs. non-polarized - 1.1 log CFU/g, p = 0.026. : vs Tegaderm only - 1.6 log CFU/g, p = 0.0015, vs non-polarized - 1.6 log CFU/g, p = 0.0032), and MRSA alone (vs Tegaderm only - 1.3 log CFU/g, p = 0.0048, vs. non-polarized - 1.1 log CFU/g, p = 0.0048), without compromising wound healing or causing tissue toxicity. Addition of systemic antibiotics did not enhance the antimicrobial efficacy of e-bandages, highlighting their potential as standalone therapies. This study provides additional evidence for the HOCl-producing e-bandage as a novel antimicrobial strategy for managing wound infections, including in the context of antibiotic resistance and polymicrobial infections.
伤口感染因耐药性细菌病原体的流行而加剧,因此需要创新的抗菌方法。多种细菌感染通常涉及耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA),由于生物膜的形成和抗生素耐药性,带来了巨大挑战。次氯酸(HOCl)是免疫系统自然产生的一种强效抗菌剂,有望成为一种替代疗法。一种能产生HOCl的电化学绷带(电子绷带)被评估用于治疗含有MRSA和具有“难治性”耐药性的其他细菌的小鼠伤口生物膜感染。此前,已证明产生HOCl的电子绷带可减少仅含有其他细菌的伤口生物膜。与非极化电子绷带(不产生HOCl)和仅使用 Tegaderm的对照组相比,极化电子绷带降低了感染MRSA加其他细菌(MRSA:与仅使用 Tegaderm相比 - 1.4 log CFU/g,p = 0.0015,与非极化相比 - 1.1 log CFU/g,p = 0.026。其他细菌:与仅使用 Tegaderm相比 - 1.6 log CFU/g,p = 0.0015,与非极化相比 - 1.6 log CFU/g,p = 0.0032)以及仅感染MRSA(与仅使用 Tegaderm相比 - 1.3 log CFU/g,p = 0.0048,与非极化相比 - 1.1 log CFU/g,p = 0.0048)的伤口中的细菌载量,且不影响伤口愈合或引起组织毒性。添加全身用抗生素并未增强电子绷带的抗菌效果,突出了其作为独立疗法的潜力。本研究为产生HOCl的电子绷带作为管理伤口感染的新型抗菌策略提供了更多证据,包括在抗生素耐药和多种细菌感染的情况下。