Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Center for Digital Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 May 21;83(20):1939-1952. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.03.382. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
Most patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease fail to achieve guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Twice-yearly inclisiran lowers LDL-C by ∼50% when added to statins.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy (adding inclisiran immediately upon failure to reach LDL-C <70 mg/dL despite receiving maximally tolerated statins) vs representative usual care in U.S. patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
VICTORION-INITIATE, a prospective, pragmatically designed trial, randomized patients 1:1 to inclisiran (284 mg at days 0, 90, and 270) plus usual care (lipid management at treating physician's discretion) vs usual care alone. Primary endpoints were percentage change in LDL-C from baseline and statin discontinuation rates.
We randomized 450 patients (30.9% women, 12.4% Black, 15.3% Hispanic); mean baseline LDL-C was 97.4 mg/dL. The "inclisiran first" strategy led to significantly greater reductions in LDL-C from baseline to day 330 vs usual care (60.0% vs 7.0%; P < 0.001). Statin discontinuation rates with "inclisiran first" (6.0%) were noninferior vs usual care (16.7%). More "inclisiran first" patients achieved LDL-C goals vs usual care (<70 mg/dL: 81.8% vs 22.2%; <55 mg/dL: 71.6% vs 8.9%; P < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and serious TEAE rates compared similarly between treatment strategies (62.8% vs 53.7% and 11.5% vs 13.4%, respectively). Injection-site TEAEs and TEAEs causing treatment withdrawal occurred more commonly with "inclisiran first" than usual care (10.3% vs 0.0% and 2.6% vs 0.0%, respectively).
An "inclisiran first" implementation strategy led to greater LDL-C lowering compared with usual care without discouraging statin use or raising new safety concerns. (A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of an "Inclisiran First" Implementation Strategy to Usual Care on LDL Cholesterol [LDL-C] in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated LDL-C [≥70 mg/dL] Despite Receiving Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy [VICTORION-INITIATE]; NCT04929249).
大多数动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者未能达到指南指导的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标。依洛尤单抗每半年给药一次,可使 LDL-C 降低约 50%。
本研究评估了“依洛尤单抗优先”实施策略(在最大耐受他汀类药物治疗后 LDL-C<70mg/dL 仍未达标时立即加用依洛尤单抗)与美国动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者代表性常规护理相比的有效性。
VICTORION-INITIATE 是一项前瞻性、实用设计的试验,将患者按 1:1 随机分为依洛尤单抗(第 0、90 和 270 天各 284mg)+常规护理(由治疗医生决定的血脂管理)与单独常规护理。主要终点为 LDL-C 自基线的百分比变化和他汀类药物停药率。
我们随机纳入了 450 例患者(30.9%为女性,12.4%为黑人,15.3%为西班牙裔);平均基线 LDL-C 为 97.4mg/dL。与常规护理相比,“依洛尤单抗优先”策略可显著降低 LDL-C(自基线至第 330 天:60.0% vs 7.0%;P<0.001)。“依洛尤单抗优先”(6.0%)的他汀类药物停药率不劣于常规护理(16.7%)。与常规护理相比,更多的“依洛尤单抗优先”患者达到 LDL-C 目标(<70mg/dL:81.8% vs 22.2%;<55mg/dL:71.6% vs 8.9%;P<0.001)。两种治疗策略的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)和严重 TEAE 发生率相似(62.8% vs 53.7%和 11.5% vs 13.4%)。与常规护理相比,“依洛尤单抗优先”更常见注射部位 TEAEs 和因 TEAEs 而停药的情况(10.3% vs 0.0%和 2.6% vs 0.0%)。
与常规护理相比,“依洛尤单抗优先”策略可在不抑制他汀类药物使用或引起新的安全性担忧的情况下,更有效地降低 LDL-C。