Williams Olajide, Ting Tina, Matthews Lisa, Block Gladys, Block Torin, Teresi Jeanne, Eimicke Joseph, Kong Jian, Silver Stephanie, Ravenell Joseph, Mallaiah Janhavi, Jammalamadaka Soujanya, Nelson Laura Maudene, Karmally Wahida, Hankerson Sidney
Columbia University Medical Center: Columbia University Irving Medical Center.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center.
Res Sq. 2024 Apr 9:rs.3.rs-3797889. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3797889/v1.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most lethal cancer in the United States (U.S.) with the highest incidence and mortality rates among African Americans (AAs) compared to other racial groups. Despite these disparities, AAs are the least likely to undergo CRC screening, have precancerous colorectal polys removed, and have CRC detected at stages early enough for curative excision. In addition, compelling evidence links inflammatory dietary patterns to increased CRC and cardiovascular disease risk. Studies show that AA churches can successfully engage in health promotion activities including those related to cancer control. The current study seeks to leverage church-placed Community Health Workers (CHWs) to increase CRC screening and reduce CRC risk.
We aim to (1) increase guideline concordant CRC screening uptake using church-placed CHWs trained in screening with a validated instrument, Brief Intervention using Motivational Interviewing, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT); and (2) reduce dietary risk factors (inflammatory dietary patterns) linked to CRC. The latter will be addressed by culturally adapting an existing, web-based lifestyle program called Alive!. Using a Hybrid Type 1 Implementation-Effectiveness cluster randomized design, we will randomize 22 AA churches into either the dual intervention arm (CHW-led SBIRT intervention plus Alive!) or a usual care arm comprised of CRC prevention educational pamphlets and a list of CRC screening sites. We will recruit 440 subjects and evaluate the effects of both arms on screening uptake (colonoscopy, fecal DNA) (primary outcome) and dietary inflammation score (secondary outcome) at 6-months follow up, and Life Simple7 (LS7) - a cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score - at 6 months and 1-year (secondary outcome). Finally, guided by a racism-conscious adaptation of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we will conduct a mixed-methods process evaluation with key stakeholders to understand multi-level influences on CRC screening and CVD risk behaviors.
Church-placed CHWs are trusted influential connectors between communities and health systems. Studies have shown that these CHWs can successfully implement health prevention protocols in churches, including those related to cancer control, making them potentially important community mediators of CRC screening uptake and CRC/CVD risk reduction.
NCT05174286.
结直肠癌(CRC)是美国第二大致命癌症,与其他种族群体相比,非裔美国人(AA)的发病率和死亡率最高。尽管存在这些差异,但非裔美国人接受CRC筛查、切除癌前结直肠息肉以及在早期阶段发现CRC以便进行根治性切除的可能性最小。此外,有力证据表明炎症性饮食模式与CRC和心血管疾病风险增加有关。研究表明,非裔美国人教会能够成功开展健康促进活动,包括与癌症控制相关的活动。本研究旨在利用教会安置的社区卫生工作者(CHW)来增加CRC筛查并降低CRC风险。
我们旨在(1)通过教会安置的经过使用经过验证的工具进行筛查培训的CHW、采用动机性访谈的简短干预以及转介治疗(SBIRT),提高符合指南的CRC筛查接受率;(2)降低与CRC相关的饮食风险因素(炎症性饮食模式)。后者将通过对现有的名为“活力!”的基于网络生活方式计划进行文化适应性调整来解决。采用混合1型实施 - 效果整群随机设计,我们将把22个非裔美国人教会随机分为双重干预组(CHW主导的SBIRT干预加“活力!”)或由CRC预防教育手册和CRC筛查地点列表组成的常规护理组。我们将招募440名受试者,并在6个月随访时评估两组对筛查接受率(结肠镜检查、粪便DNA)(主要结局)和饮食炎症评分(次要结局)的影响,以及在6个月和1年时评估生命简单7项指标(LS7)——一种心血管疾病(CVD)风险评分——(次要结局)。最后,在对实施研究综合框架(CFIR)进行具有种族主义意识的调整的指导下,我们将与关键利益相关者进行混合方法的过程评估,以了解对CRC筛查和CVD风险行为的多层次影响。
教会安置的CHW是社区与卫生系统之间值得信赖且有影响力的联系纽带。研究表明,这些CHW能够在教会成功实施健康预防方案,包括与癌症控制相关的方案,使其成为CRC筛查接受率和降低CRC/CVD风险的潜在重要社区调解人。
NCT05174286。