Carrasco-Dajer Claudia Marisol, Vera-Calzaretta Aldo Renato, Ubillos-Landa Silvia, Oyanedel Juan Carlos, Díaz-Gorriti Virginia
Universidad Andres Bello, Programa De Doctorado En Educación Y Sociedad, Facultad De Educación Y Ciencias Sociales, Santiago, Chile.
Departamento Ciencias De La Enfermeria, Facultad De Medicina, Universidad Catolica De La Santisima Concepcion, Concepción, Chile.
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 15;15:1305569. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1305569. eCollection 2024.
Older people are the group with the greatest digital gap, so their digital literacy is important to improve the conditions in which they age.
A study was conducted with pre- and post-evaluation of a digital literacy (DL) intervention in people aged 60 years and over. A total of 56 participants (experimental group = 32 and control group = 24) were recruited for convenience in community centers. The intervention was adapted to the needs of the participants, there were five face-to-face sessions and remote reinforcement for three months, carried out by trained university students for five months. Sociodemographic variables such as self-perception of socioeconomic level and education, among others, were evaluated. The impact was assessed using the digital literacy scale (MDPQ16), indicators of frequency and types of internet and mobile phone use, health literacy (SAHLSA and NSV), quality of life (SF-12), hedonic well-being (Diener's SWLS and Cummins' PWI) and perceived social support using the Zimet scale.
The intervention had a significant impact with an effect size of = 0.27 on digital literacy, separate t-test comparisons revealed a markedly significant change for digital literacy in the experimental group, before and after the pre-post -test 3.56, = 0.001, but not in the control group, = 0.082, = 0.93. No direct impact on health literacy, health-related quality of life, and hedonic well-being was identified. We examined the indirect impact of change in digital literacy and found that it correlated with improvements in well-being and social support, as well as quality of life. Individuals with significant changes were detected and compared with those who did not change.
Evaluation that contributes by identifying elements for improvement in future interventions and discusses the importance of culturally adapting continuing education in older people.
老年人是数字鸿沟最大的群体,因此他们的数字素养对于改善其老龄化状况至关重要。
对60岁及以上人群的数字素养(DL)干预措施进行了一项前后评估研究。为方便起见,在社区中心招募了56名参与者(实验组=32人,对照组=24人)。干预措施根据参与者的需求进行调整,由受过培训的大学生开展了为期五个月的五次面对面课程和为期三个月的远程强化培训。评估了社会人口统计学变量,如社会经济水平和教育程度的自我认知等。使用数字素养量表(MDPQ16)、互联网和手机使用频率及类型指标、健康素养(SAHLSA和NSV)、生活质量(SF-12)、享乐幸福感(迪纳的SWLS和康明斯的PWI)以及使用齐梅特量表的感知社会支持来评估影响。
该干预措施对数字素养产生了显著影响,效应大小为=0.27,独立样本t检验比较显示,实验组在前后测之间数字素养有明显显著变化,前测为3.56,后测为=0.001,但对照组没有,=0.082,=0.93。未发现对健康素养、与健康相关的生活质量和享乐幸福感有直接影响。我们研究了数字素养变化的间接影响,发现它与幸福感、社会支持以及生活质量的改善相关。检测到有显著变化的个体并与未变化的个体进行了比较。
评估通过确定未来干预措施中需要改进的要素做出贡献,并讨论了在老年人中进行文化适应性继续教育的重要性。