ECIMAT, Centro de Investigación Mariña (CIM), Universidade de Vigo, 36331, Vigo, Galicia, Spain; Facultade de Ciencias do Mar, Universidade de Vigo, 36310, Vigo, Galicia, Spain.
ECIMAT, Centro de Investigación Mariña (CIM), Universidade de Vigo, 36331, Vigo, Galicia, Spain; RWTH Aachen University, Institute for Environmental Research, Worringer Weg 1, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Environ Pollut. 2024 Jun 15;351:124096. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124096. Epub 2024 May 2.
Plastic bags are currently a major component of marine litter, causing aesthetical nuisance, and undesirable effects on marine fauna that ingest them or are entangled. Plastic litter also rises concern on the ecotoxicological effects due to the potential toxicity of the chemical additives leached in aquatic environments. Conventional plastic bags are made of polyethylene, either from first use or recycled, but regulations restricting single-use plastics and limiting lightweight carrier bags (<50 μm thickness) have fostered the replacement of thin PE bags by compostable materials advertised as safer for the environment. In this study, we assess the degradation of commercially available plastic bags in marine conditions at two scales: aquariums (60 days) and outdoors flow-through mesocosm (120 days). Strength at break point and other tensile strength parameters were used as ecologically relevant endpoints to track mechanical degradation. Ecotoxicity has been assessed along the incubation period using the sensitive Paracentrotus lividus embryo test. Whereas PE bags did not substantially lose their mechanical properties within the 60 d aquarium exposures, compostable bags showed remarkable weight loss and tensile strength decay, some of them fragmenting in the aquarium after 3-4 weeks. Sediment pore water inoculum promoted a more rapid degradation of compostable bags, while nutrient addition pattern did not affect the degradation rate. Longer-term mesocosms exposures supported these findings, as well as pointed out the influence of the microbial processes on the degradation efficiency of compostable/bioplastic bags. Compostable materials, in contrast toPE, showed moderate toxicity on sea-urchin larvae, partially associated to degradation of these materials, but the environmental implications of these findings remain to be assessed. These methods proved to be useful to classify plastic materials, according to their degradability in marine conditions, in a remarkably shorter time than current standard tests and promote new materials safer for the marine fauna.
塑料袋目前是海洋垃圾的主要组成部分,不仅会造成美学上的困扰,还会对吞食或被其缠绕的海洋动物产生不良影响。由于塑料垃圾中化学添加剂在水生环境中浸出的潜在毒性,其还引起了人们对生态毒理学效应的关注。传统塑料袋由聚乙烯制成,无论是初次使用还是回收利用,但限制一次性塑料和限制轻型载物袋(<50μm 厚度)的法规促进了可生物降解材料替代薄型聚乙烯袋,这些材料被宣传为对环境更安全。在这项研究中,我们在两个尺度上评估了商业上可用的塑料袋在海洋条件下的降解:水族馆(60 天)和户外流动中观生态系统(120 天)。断裂点强度和其他拉伸强度参数被用作跟踪机械降解的生态相关终点。在孵育期间,使用敏感的 Paracentrotus lividus 胚胎测试评估了生态毒性。虽然在 60 天的水族馆暴露期间,PE 袋没有显著损失其机械性能,但可堆肥袋显示出显著的重量损失和拉伸强度衰减,其中一些在 3-4 周后在水族馆中破裂。沉积物孔隙水接种物促进了可堆肥袋的更快降解,而养分添加模式不会影响降解速率。更长时间的中观生态系统暴露支持了这些发现,并且指出了微生物过程对可堆肥/生物塑料袋降解效率的影响。与 PE 相比,可堆肥材料对海胆幼虫表现出中等毒性,部分与这些材料的降解有关,但这些发现对环境的影响仍有待评估。这些方法被证明是有用的,根据它们在海洋条件下的可降解性对塑料材料进行分类,比当前的标准测试快得多,并促进了对海洋动物更安全的新材料。