Department of Natural Sciences, Mercy University, Dobbs Ferry, NY, USA.
Plant Signal Behav. 2024 Dec 31;19(1):2345413. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2024.2345413. Epub 2024 May 6.
The 21st-century "plant neurobiology" movement is an amalgam of scholars interested in how "neural processes", broadly defined, lead to changes in plant behavior. Integral to the movement (now called plant behavioral biology) is a triad of historically marginalized subdisciplines, namely plant ethology, whole plant electrophysiology and plant comparative psychology, that set plant neurobiology apart from the mainstream. A central tenet held by these "triad disciplines" is that plants are exquisitely sensitive to environmental perturbations and that destructive experimental manipulations rapidly and profoundly affect plant function. Since destructive measurements have been the norm in plant physiology, much of our "textbook knowledge" concerning plant physiology is unrelated to normal plant function. As such, scientists in the triad disciplines favor a more natural and holistic approach toward understanding plant function. By examining the history, philosophy, sociology and psychology of the triad disciplines, this paper refutes in eight ways the criticism that plant neurobiology presents nothing new, and that the topics of plant neurobiology fall squarely under the purview of mainstream plant physiology. It is argued that although the triad disciplines and mainstream plant physiology share the common goal of understanding plant function, they are distinct in having their own intellectual histories and epistemologies.
21 世纪的“植物神经生物学”运动是一批对“神经过程”感兴趣的学者的融合,他们广泛研究“神经过程”如何导致植物行为的变化。该运动(现在称为植物行为生物学)的核心是三个历史上边缘化的子学科,即植物行为学、整株植物电生理学和植物比较心理学,它们使植物神经生物学有别于主流。这些“三大学科”的一个核心原则是,植物对环境干扰非常敏感,破坏性的实验操作会迅速而深刻地影响植物的功能。由于破坏性的测量一直是植物生理学的规范,我们关于植物生理学的许多“教科书知识”都与正常植物功能无关。因此,三大学科的科学家倾向于采用更自然和整体的方法来理解植物功能。通过考察三大学科的历史、哲学、社会学和心理学,本文从八个方面反驳了植物神经生物学没有提出新观点的批评,以及植物神经生物学的主题完全属于主流植物生理学的范畴。本文认为,尽管三大学科和主流植物生理学都有理解植物功能的共同目标,但它们在各自的历史和认识论上是不同的。