Health Promotion Research Centre, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
School of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK
BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e082247. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082247.
Despite the evidence supporting the value of digital supports for enhancing youth mental health services, there is a lack of guidance on how best to engage with young people in coproduction processes during the design and evaluation of these technologies. User input is crucial in digital mental health, especially for disadvantaged, vulnerable and marginalised young people as they are often excluded from coproduction. A scoping review of international literature written in English will explore the coproduction processes with marginalised young people in digital mental health supports, from mental health promotion to targeted interventions. The review is guided by the research question: what are the most appropriate coproduction processes for engaging young people, especially marginalised young people, in the different stages of designing and evaluating digital mental health supports? The review aims to map and summarise the evidence, inform the overall research project and address the knowledge gaps.
The scoping review uses Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews. From 22-24 October 2023, PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, ASSIA, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane database, Embase, Google Scholar, ProQuest, OAIster and BASE will be systematically searched. Papers from 2021 onwards with a range of study designs and evidence that illustrate engagement with marginalised young people (aged 16-25) in the design, implementation and evaluation of digital technologies for young people's mental health will be considered for inclusion. At least two reviewers will screen full texts and chart data. The results of this review will be summarised quantitatively through numerical counts of included literature and qualitatively through a narrative synthesis.
Ethical approval is not required. Results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals.
This scoping review protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/9xhgv).
尽管有证据表明数字支持对于增强青少年心理健康服务具有价值,但在设计和评估这些技术时,如何最好地让年轻人参与共同创作过程方面,缺乏指导。用户输入在数字心理健康中至关重要,特别是对于弱势、脆弱和边缘化的年轻人来说,因为他们往往被排除在共同创作之外。一项关于英语国际文献的范围综述将探讨数字心理健康支持中与边缘化年轻人的共同创作过程,从心理健康促进到有针对性的干预。该综述由以下研究问题指导:在设计和评估数字心理健康支持的不同阶段,最适合让年轻人,特别是边缘化的年轻人参与的共同创作过程是什么?该综述旨在绘制和总结证据,为整个研究项目提供信息,并解决知识空白。
该范围综述使用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的框架以及《系统评价和荟萃分析报告规范扩展的首选报告项目》。2023 年 10 月 22 日至 24 日,将系统地搜索 PubMed、Scopus、EBSCO、ASSIA、Web of Science、Ovid MEDLINE、Cochrane 数据库、Embase、Google Scholar、ProQuest、OAIster 和 BASE。将考虑纳入具有各种研究设计和证据的论文,这些论文表明在设计、实施和评估针对年轻人心理健康的数字技术时,与边缘化的年轻人(16-25 岁)进行了合作。至少两名评审员将筛选全文并记录数据。通过纳入文献的数量进行定量总结,并通过叙述性综合进行定性总结。
不需要伦理批准。结果将通过在同行评议期刊上发表文章来传播。
该范围综述方案已在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/9xhgv)上注册。